Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31741
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKomalasari, Ritaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Sarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHaw, Sallyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-26T00:02:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-26T00:02:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01en_UK
dc.identifier.other102978en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31741-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) programmes are regarded as a gold standard treatment for people living with Opioid Use Disorders (OUDs). However, OAT programmes are often unavailable or poorly implemented in prisons, in spite of the large numbers of people living with OUDs and the high risk of HIV transmission in prison settings. Unusually, this systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence relating to barriers to, and facilitators of, the implementation of OAT programmes in prisons in high- and low/middle-income countries (LMICs) to provide more nuanced, contextualised understandings of how prison stakeholders perceive and/or experience OAT programmes within different prison settings. Methods: We systematically reviewed six electronic databases for studies published between January 2005 and December 2019 involving prison stakeholders: policy-makers, governors, healthcare staff, prison officers, and prisoners. The search identified 8091 studies, of which only 16 incorporated qualitative methods (including qualitative elements of mixed methods) and met our quality criteria. Four of these studies were conducted in LMICs (Kyrgyzstan, Iran (2) and Indonesia). Results: Findings were organized under three broad themes: (1) perceived benefits of OAT programmes; (2) barriers to the implementation and development of OAT programmes; and (3) treatment processes. Discussion: A lack of a clear understanding of the roles of OAT programmes and doubts regarding their effectiveness for people living with OUDs in prisons are critical barriers to prisoner participation in both high-and LMIC countries. Prison systems, particularly in LMICs, often lack the resources to mitigate problems with implementation. This review highlights an urgent need to develop further qualitative studies into prison OAT programmes, employing varied methods to explore such contexts in greater depth and minimize the impact of harms relating to OUDs in prisons.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationKomalasari R, Wilson S & Haw S (2021) A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence on Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) Programmes in Prisons. International Journal of Drug Policy, 87, Art. No.: 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102978en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Komalasari R, Wilson S, Puspitasari M & Haw S (2021) A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence on Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) Programmes in Prisons. International Journal of Drug Policy, 87, Art. No.: 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102978 © 2020, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectprisonen_UK
dc.subjectopioiden_UK
dc.subjectmethadoneen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative studiesen_UK
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_UK
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence on Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) Programmes in Prisonsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[DRUGPO-D-19-514_R3.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102978en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid33129135en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Drug Policyen_UK
dc.citation.issn0955-3959en_UK
dc.citation.volume87en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailrita.komalasari2012@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/10/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000632598300013en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85094604270en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1665460en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3835-5398en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7844-0362en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-09-19en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-19en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-09-25en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKomalasari, Rita|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilson, Sarah|0000-0002-3835-5398en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaw, Sally|0000-0001-7844-0362en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-10-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2021-10-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2021-10-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDRUGPO-D-19-514_R3.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0955-3959en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DRUGPO-D-19-514_R3.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version537.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.