Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31418
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Danielleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCritchlow, Nathanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-11T00:00:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-11T00:00:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-23en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31418-
dc.description.abstractAim: From 20th May 2017, cigarettes in the United Kingdom must be sold in standardised (plain) packaging. We explore post-implementation reactions to standardised cigarette packaging among never-smokers in Scotland, whether reactions vary in relation to permitted variations in pack structure, and whether reactions are associated with susceptibility. Methods: A cross-sectional survey with 12-17 year-old never-smokers (n=507) in Scotland, conducted November 2017-November 2018. Participants were shown one ‘regular’ standardised cigarette pack (flip-top lid and straight-edged pack, similar to designs in Australia) and three standardised packs with varied pack structures (bevelled-edges, slim pack, and shoulder box), which are permitted post-implementation in the UK. Participants rated each pack on eight five-point reaction measures (e.g. attractiveness). Participants also indicated which pack, if any, they would choose. Smoking susceptibility was the outcome. Results: The mean reaction scores for all four packs were mostly negative, however the shoulder box was consistently rated less negatively than the regular, slim, or bevelled-edge packs. Most participants (87%) said they would not select any of the four packs, although susceptible participants were more likely to select one than non-susceptible participants (25% vs. 7%; χ2=29.70; p=0.001). For all four packs, not finding them off-putting was associated with susceptibility (Adjusted Odds Ratio range: 2.73-3.69), albeit only a minority of adolescents did not find each pack off-putting. Conclusions: Adolescents have negative reactions to the standardised cigarette packs implemented in the United Kingdom, albeit permitted variations in structure can reduce the extent of negativity. Most reactions to standardised packaging had no association with susceptibility.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_UK
dc.relationMitchell D, Critchlow N, Moodie C & Bauld L (2020) Reactions to standardised cigarette packs with varying structural designs, and the association with smoking susceptibility: A post-implementation cross-sectional survey with never-smoking adolescents in Scotland. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa109en_UK
dc.rights[ntaa109.pdf] This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights[Mitchell et al NTR20.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.subjectsmokingen_UK
dc.subjecttobaccoen_UK
dc.subjectstandardised packagingen_UK
dc.subjectstandardized packagingen_UK
dc.subjectplain packagingen_UK
dc.subjectadolescentsen_UK
dc.subjectcross-sectional surveyen_UK
dc.subjectsusceptibilityen_UK
dc.titleReactions to standardised cigarette packs with varying structural designs, and the association with smoking susceptibility: A post-implementation cross-sectional survey with never-smoking adolescents in Scotlanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2021-06-24en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Mitchell et al NTR20.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[ntaa109.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ntr/ntaa109en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32577739en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNicotine and Tobacco Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-994Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-994Xen_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailnathan.critchlow@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date23/06/2020en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1639979en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9145-8874en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-06-10en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-07-08en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mitchell et al NTR20.pdfFulltext - Published Version417.28 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy
ntaa109.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.09 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2021-06-24    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.