Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31355
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatterson, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDinan, Williamen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-30T00:06:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-30T00:06:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06en_UK
dc.identifier.other4320en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31355-
dc.description.abstractThe science on the effects of global climate change and air pollution on morbidity and mortality is clear and debate now centres around the scale and precise contributions of particular pollutants. Sufficient data existed in recent decades to support the adoption of precautionary public health policies relating to fossil fuels including shale exploration. Yet air quality and related public health impacts linked to ethical and environmental justice elements are often marginalized or missing in planning and associated decision making. Industry and government policies and practices, laws and planning regulations lagged well behind the science in the United Kingdom. This paper explores the reasons for this and what shaped some of those policies. Why did shale gas policies in England fail to fully address public health priorities and neglect ethical and environmental justice concerns. To answer this question, an interdisciplinary analysis is needed informed by a theoretical framework of how air pollution and climate change are largely discounted in the complex realpolitik of policy and regulation for shale gas development in England. Sources, including official government, regulatory and planning documents, as well as industry and scientific publications are examined and benchmarked against the science and ethical and environmental justice criteria. Further, our typology illustrates how the process works drawing on an analysis of official policy documents and statements on planning and regulatory oversight of shale exploration in England, and material from industry and their consultants relating to proposed shale oil and gas development. Currently the oil, gas and chemical industries in England continue to dominate and influence energy and feedstock-related policy making to the detriment of ethical and environmental justice decision making with significant consequences for public health.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPIen_UK
dc.relationWatterson A & Dinan W (2020) Lagging and Flagging: Air Pollution, Shale Gas Exploration and the Interaction of Policy, Science, Ethics and Environmental Justice in England. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (12), Art. No.: 4320. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124320en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectshale explorationen_UK
dc.subjectair pollutionen_UK
dc.subjectethicsen_UK
dc.subjectenvironmental justiceen_UK
dc.titleLagging and Flagging: Air Pollution, Shale Gas Exploration and the Interaction of Policy, Science, Ethics and Environmental Justice in Englanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17124320en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32560334en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1660-4601en_UK
dc.citation.volume17en_UK
dc.citation.issue12en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date17/06/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCommunications, Media and Cultureen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000549406100001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85086753439en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1639191en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4259-2150en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-06-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-06-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-06-29en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWatterson, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDinan, William|0000-0002-4259-2150en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-06-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-06-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameijerph-17-04320.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1660-4601en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-17-04320.pdfFulltext - Published Version821.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.