Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31295
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShephard, Daniel Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorEllersiek, Anneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMeuer, Johannesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRupietta, Christianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMayne, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCairney, Paulen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T00:00:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-19T00:00:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31295-
dc.description.abstractThere is a need to conduct more diverse cross-case analyses in the Multiple Streams Approach (MSA) literature which originated in the United States, to show how key concepts, such as a windows-of-opportunity and the role of policy entrepreneurs, manifest in different political contexts. We apply Qualitative Comparative Analysis for a cross-case analysis of a unique dataset representing 20 countries from four continents. This approach allows us to highlight distinct pathways to influencing policies. We identify four configurations for expanding civic spaces and two configurations for changing policies. We identify three findings novel to MSA: there are two distinctive policy entrepreneur roles involving local and international civil society actors; effective entrepreneurship is conditional on strengthening civic voice and creating civic space conducive to advocacy; and, therefore, effective entrepreneurs often must focus on expanding the civic space to discuss policy problems and the technical and political feasibility of policy solutionsen_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationShephard DD, Ellersiek A, Meuer J, Rupietta C, Mayne R & Cairney P (2021) Kingdon's Multiple Streams Approach in new political contexts: Consolidation, configuration, and new findings. Governance, 34 (2), pp. 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12521en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Shephard, DD, Ellersiek, A, Meuer, J, Rupietta, C, Mayne, R, Cairney, P. Kingdon's multiple streams approach in new political contexts: Consolidation, configuration, and new findings. Governance. 2021; 34: 523-543, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12521. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.titleKingdon's Multiple Streams Approach in new political contexts: Consolidation, configuration, and new findingsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2022-07-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Shephard et al Governance full accepted version 2020.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 24 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gove.12521en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleGovernanceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-0491en_UK
dc.citation.issn0952-1895en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage523en_UK
dc.citation.epage543en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailp.a.cairney@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date30/07/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationColumbia Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Advanced Sustainability Studiesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOxfam GBen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPoliticsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000553547100001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85088799839en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1636545en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9956-832Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-06-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-06-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-06-18en_UK
dc.subject.tagEntrepreneurshipen_UK
dc.subject.tagGovernanceen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorShephard, Daniel D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEllersiek, Anne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMeuer, Johannes|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRupietta, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMayne, Ruth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCairney, Paul|0000-0002-9956-832Xen_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-07-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2022-07-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2022-07-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameShephard et al Governance full accepted version 2020.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1468-0491en_UK
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shephard et al Governance full accepted version 2020.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.