Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31176
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Clinical and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self‐management compared to clinic based care for pelvic organ prolapse: protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trial
Author(s): Hagen, Suzanne
Kearney, Rohna
Goodman, Kirsteen
Melone, Lynn
Elders, Andrew
Manoukian, Sarkis
Agur, Wael
Best, Catherine
Breeman, Suzanne
Dembinsky, Melanie
Dwyer, Lucy
Forrest, Mark
Graham, Margaret
Guerrero, Karen
Bugge, Carol
Contact Email: carol.bugge@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Prolapse
Pessary
Self-management
Quality of life
Economic Evaluation
Randomised controlled trial (RCT)
Citation: Hagen S, Kearney R, Goodman K, Melone L, Elders A, Manoukian S, Agur W, Best C, Breeman S, Dembinsky M, Dwyer L, Forrest M, Graham M, Guerrero K & Bugge C (2020) Clinical and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self‐management compared to clinic based care for pelvic organ prolapse: protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trial. Trials.
Abstract: Background Pelvic organ prolapse (or prolapse) is a common condition in women where the pelvic organs (bladder, bowel or womb) descend into the vagina and cause distressing symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Many women will use a vaginal pessary to treat their prolapse symptoms. Clinic based care usually consists of having a pessary fitted in a primary or secondary care setting, and returning approximately every six months for healthcare professional review and pessary change. However, it is possible that women could remove, clean and re‐insert their pessary themselves; this is called self‐management. This trial aims to assess if self‐management of a vaginal pessary is associated with better quality of life for women with prolapse when compared to clinic based care. Methods This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in at least 17 UK centres. The intervention group will receive pessary self-management teaching, a self-management information leaflet, a follow up phone call and access to a local telephone number for clinical support. The control group will receive the clinic based pessary care which is standard at their centre. Demographic and medical history data will be collected from both groups at baseline. The primary outcome is condition‐specific quality of life at 18 months’ post-randomisation. Several secondary outcomes will also be assessed using participant-completed questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months’ post-randomisation. An economic evaluation will be carried out alongside the trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation will run parallel to the trial, the protocol for which is reported in a companion paper. Discussion The results of the trial will provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of pessary self-management compared to clinic based care in terms of improving women's quality of life, and of its cost-effectiveness.
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming Additional co-authors: Christine Hemming, Aethele Khunda, Helen Mason, Doreen McClurg, John Norrie, Anastasia Karachalia-Sandri, Ranee Thakar

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TRLS-D-19-01151_JC SH FINAL for resubmission 12-03-20.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version538.86 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2022-03-25    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.