Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31157
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Burley, Claire V | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Lucas, Rebekah A I | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Whittaker, Anna C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Mullinger, Karen | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Lucas, Samuel J E | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-16T00:01:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-16T00:01:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-01 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31157 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide (CVR) is a common functional test to assess brain vascular health, though conflicting age and fitness effects have been reported. Studies have used different CO 2 stimulus durations to induce CVR and extracted data from different time points for analysis. Therefore, this study examined whether these differences alter CVR and explain conflicting findings. Eighteen healthy volunteers (24 5 years) inhaled CO ± 2 for four stimulus durations (1, 2, 4 and 5 min) of 5% CO 2 (in air) via the open-circuit Douglas bag method, in a randomized order. CVR data were derived from transcranial Doppler (TCD) measures of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), with concurrent ventilatory sensitivity to the CO 2 stimulus (̇ V E,CO 2). Repeated measures ANOVAs compared CVR and ̇ V E,CO 2 measures between stimulus durations and steady-state time points. An effect of stimulus duration was observed (P = 0.002, í µí¼ 2 = = 0.140), with 1 min (P 0.010) and 2 min (P < 0.001) differing from 4 min, and 2 min differing from 5 min (P = 0.019) durations. ̇ V E CO , 2 sensitivity increased ∼3-fold from 1 min to 4 and 5 min durations (P < 0.001, í µí¼ 2 = 0.485). CVRs calculated from different steady-state time points within each stimulus duration were different (P < 0.001, í µí¼ 2 = = 0.454), specifically for 4 min (P 0.001) and 5 min (P P < 0.001), but not 2 min stimulus durations (= 0.273). These findings demonstrate that methodological differences alter the CVR measure. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_UK |
dc.relation | Burley CV, Lucas RAI, Whittaker AC, Mullinger K & Lucas SJE (2020) The CO2 stimulus duration and steady-state time point used for data extraction alters the cerebrovascular reactivity outcome measure. Experimental Physiology, 105 (5), pp. 893-903. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP087883 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Burley, CV, Lucas, RAI, Whittaker, AC, Mullinger, K, Lucas, SJE. The CO2 stimulus duration and steady-state time point used for data extraction alters the cerebrovascular reactivity outcome measure. Experimental Physiology. 2020; 105: 893– 903, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1113/EP087883. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf | en_UK |
dc.subject | cerebrovascular reactivity | en_UK |
dc.subject | CO2 stimulus | en_UK |
dc.subject | transcranial Doppler | en_UK |
dc.title | The CO2 stimulus duration and steady-state time point used for data extraction alters the cerebrovascular reactivity outcome measure | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2021-02-22 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [accepted_article_feb_2020.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1113/EP087883 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32083357 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Experimental Physiology | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1469-445X | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0958-0670 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 105 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 5 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 893 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 903 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | The Physiological Society | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.author.email | a.c.whittaker@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 21/02/2020 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000520521400001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85082021829 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1617901 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5461-0598 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-19 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-02-19 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2020-05-14 | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Stirling Physical Activity Research, Knowledge & Learning Exchange (SPARKLE) | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Burley, Claire V| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Lucas, Rebekah A I| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Whittaker, Anna C|0000-0002-5461-0598 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Mullinger, Karen| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Lucas, Samuel J E| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|University of Birmingham|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000855 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|The Physiological Society| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2021-02-22 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2021-02-21 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2021-02-22| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | accepted_article_feb_2020.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1469-445X | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accepted_article_feb_2020.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.