Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31084
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: 'They only smoke in the house when I'm not in': Understanding the limited effectiveness of a smoke-free homes intervention
Author(s): O'Donnell, Rachel
Amos, Amanda
Turner, Stephen
Adams, Lynn
Henderson, Tracy
Lyttle, Susan
Mitchell, Shirley
Semple, Sean
Contact Email: e.a.fuller@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: children
education
gender
intervention
qualitative
second-hand smoke
Issue Date: 23-Apr-2020
Citation: O'Donnell R, Amos A, Turner S, Adams L, Henderson T, Lyttle S, Mitchell S & Semple S (2020) 'They only smoke in the house when I'm not in': Understanding the limited effectiveness of a smoke-free homes intervention. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa042
Abstract: Background: Children’s second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure in the home is highest in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. Personalised household air quality measurements can promote changes in smoking that reduce SHS exposure. The ‘First Steps 2 Smoke-free’ (FS2SF) intervention is the first to trial this approach delivered as part of health professionals’ routine work. This paper reports the findings of qualitative interviews with participants that explored their experiences of the intervention and why outcomes varied. Methods: 120 women were recruited from the NHS First Steps Programme, which supports disadvantaged mothers. They received either personalised feedback on their home air quality and advice on reducing SHS or standard SHS advice. Qualitative interviews with 15 mothers were analysed thematically using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) model. Results: The intervention increased women’s capability to change home smoking behaviour, through increasing awareness and salience of SHS risks to their children, and motivation to act. However, taking effective action was constrained by their limited social and environmental opportunities, including others’ smoking in the home. Conclusions: The FS2SF intervention was ineffective as it was unable to fully address the precarious, complex life circumstances that make creating a smoke-free home particularly difficult for women experiencing intersecting dimensions of disadvantage.  
DOI Link: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa042
Rights: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fdaa042.pdfFulltext - Published Version977.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.