Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31082
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSehmi, Rukmenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRushton, Alanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPickles, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaughan, Barbaraen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-01T00:00:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-01T00:00:16Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31082-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Adoption studies can cast light on environmental influences on development, but heterogeneity in preplacement experiences often complicates interpretation of findings. Methods: We studied infant-adopted samples drawn from the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts and examined mental health, well-being, physical health and externalizing outcomes at mid-life. Outcomes for adopted cohort members were compared with those of (a) individuals raised in two biological parent families ('general population' comparisons) and (b) birth comparison groups of other nonadopted children from similar circumstances at birth. Results: In both cohorts, to-be-adopted children shared early characteristics in common with birth comparison children, but were placed in more socially advantaged adoptive homes. Followed to mid-life, there were few group differences on indicators of physical health or psychological well-being. Levels of psychological distress were comparable in the adopted and general population samples in both cohorts, and more favourable than in the birth comparison groups among women in the 1958 cohort; more beneficial childhood family circumstances contributed to these differences. Rates of adult externalizing outcomes were comparable in the adopted and birth comparison groups in both cohorts, and higher than in the general population samples; indicators of maternal and prenatal exposures contributed to these differences. Conclusions: Rearing in adoptive homes may provide protective effects in relation to internalizing problems but may not be as protective in relation to externalizing outcomes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationSehmi R, Rushton A, Pickles A, Grant M & Maughan B (2020) Infant domestic adoption: outcomes at mid‐life. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61 (7), pp. 789-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13178en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAdoptionen_UK
dc.subjectfollow‐upen_UK
dc.subjectbirth cohorten_UK
dc.subjectmental healthen_UK
dc.subjectexternalizingen_UK
dc.titleInfant domestic adoption: outcomes at mid‐lifeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[jcpp.13178.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpp.13178en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31944295en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatryen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-7610en_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-9630en_UK
dc.citation.volume61en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spage789en_UK
dc.citation.epage797en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNuffield Foundationen_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.author.emailmargaret.grant@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date14/01/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAdoption and Fostering Allianceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000507521700001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85077898613en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1609278en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4077-5890en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-11-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-04-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSehmi, Rukmen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRushton, Alan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPickles, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGrant, Margaret|0000-0003-4077-5890en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaughan, Barbara|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectKID 41956|Nuffield Foundation|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectNF‐SI‐0617‐10120|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2269-12-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejcpp.13178.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1469-7610en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jcpp.13178.pdfFulltext - Published Version168.99 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.