Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30987
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): An evidence-based consensus study
Author(s): Duncan, Edward AS
O’Cathain, Alicia
Rousseau, Nikki
Croot, Liz
Sworn, Katie
Turner, Katrina
Yardley, Lucy
Hoddinott, Pat
Issue Date: Apr-2020
Citation: Duncan EA, O’Cathain A, Rousseau N, Croot L, Sworn K, Turner K, Yardley L & Hoddinott P (2020) Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): An evidence-based consensus study. BMJ Open, 10 (4), Art. No.: e033516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516
Abstract: Objective To improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research. Design This was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study. Participants Intervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop. Results e-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting. Conclusions Consensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice.
DOI Link: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516
Rights: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e033516.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version737.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.