|Appears in Collections:||History and Politics eTheses|
|Title:||Virtuous Intimates: the Political Friendships of John Adams, c.1774-1801|
|Publisher:||University of Stirling|
|Abstract:||This thesis studies John Adams’s five major political friendships during his twenty-seven years of national public service, 1774-1801, with: Abigail Adams, Samuel Adams, Elbridge Gerry, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Rush. Each dyad demonstrates different aspects of friendship as a political relationship: primary friendship (Abigail Adams), idolised revolutionary (Samuel Adams), political alliance (Gerry), intellectual intimacy (Rush), and rivalry (Jefferson). Hitherto, scholars overlooked the politics of friendship and political friendship when studying political leadership in the Revolutionary Era and American republicanism. This thesis overcomes such limitations and examines how Adams considered and utilised friendship in Congressional service, diplomacy, and national leadership. Adams and his friends understood and celebrated friendship as a neo-classical relationship. Friendship presented an ideal relationship which governed the interactions between citizens and provided for a model of virtue in politics. This dissertation is separated into three books based on the stages in John’s public career: the Continental Congresses (1774-1778), international diplomacy (1778-1788), and executive service (1788-1801). At each stage of his public life, Adams looked to friendship to advance his career, defend his country, and debate radicalism. John changed his expectation of friendship at each stage: Abigail emerged as his primary political counsellor; Gerry his principle political ally; Jefferson his emergent rival; Rush his manipulating but intimate friend; Samuel Adams his idolised revolutionary ally, but radical opponent. As an isolated Congressman, diplomat, and national leader, friendship provided John with the ideal forum for confidential political exchanges through which he attempted to exert influence, resist radicalism, and defend his personal politics. Adams’s often impassioned letters to friends present a window into his private rumination. He entreated friends’ support, was sensitive to any perceived diminution of intimacy, and bitterly lamented political divisions. Friendship, for Adams, was the most intimate form of politics.|
|Type:||Thesis or Dissertation|
|Macpherson PhD Submission 2020.pdf||6.65 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2025-04-06 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.