Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30959
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe, Richard Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAtef, Hadyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMackintosh, Kellyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcNarry, Melittaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRyde, Gemmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHill, Denise Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorVollaard, Niels B Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-07T00:04:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-07T00:04:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.other313en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30959-
dc.description.abstractBackground The efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIT) as a time-efficient exercise strategy for beneficially modifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease has repeatedly been demonstrated in controlled laboratory settings. However, the effectiveness of HIT in an unsupervised workplace setting has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to use mixed methods to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a short-duration, high-intensity exercise intervention (REHIT) when applied unsupervised in a workplace setting. Methods Twenty-five office-workers (mean ± SD age: 47 ± 9 y, BMI: 27.5 ± 4.4 kg·m− 2, V̇O2max: 28 ± 7 mL·kg− 1·min− 1) completed a 6-week REHIT intervention unsupervised in their workplace (n = 13, 6 men), or acted as a no-intervention control (n = 12, 6 men). The intervention consisted of 2 sessions/week of low-intensity (~ 25 W) cycling interspersed with 2 ‘all-out’ sprints, increasing in duration from 10 to 20 s per sprint over the 6 weeks (total time-commitment: 8:40 min per session). V̇O2max was assessed pre- and post-training, whilst questionnaire-based measures of exercise enjoyment, self-efficacy, and acceptability were completed post-training. Eight participants also completed post-intervention semi-structured interviews. Results V̇O2max significantly improved in the exercise group (2.25 ± 0.75 L·min− 1 vs. 2.42 ± 0.82 L·min− 1; + 7.4%) compared to the control group (2.22 ± 0.72 L·min− 1 vs. 2.17 ± 0.74 L·min− 1; − 2.3%; time*intervention interaction effect: p  en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationMetcalfe RS, Atef H, Mackintosh K, McNarry M, Ryde G, Hill DM & Vollaard NBJ (2020) Time-efficient and computer-guided sprint interval exercise training for improving health in the workplace: a randomised mixed-methods feasibility study in office-based employees. <i>BMC Public Health</i>, 20, Art. No.: 313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8444-zen_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectExerciseen_UK
dc.subjectHigh-intensity interval trainingen_UK
dc.subjectWorkplace healthen_UK
dc.subjectEffectivenessen_UK
dc.subjectFeasibilityen_UK
dc.subjectAcceptabilityen_UK
dc.subjectCardiorespiratory fitnessen_UK
dc.titleTime-efficient and computer-guided sprint interval exercise training for improving health in the workplace: a randomised mixed-methods feasibility study in office-based employeesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-020-8444-zen_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32164631en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume20en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date12/03/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCairo Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000521103400008en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85081929389en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1584014en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9117-0803en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-03-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-04-06en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMetcalfe, Richard S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAtef, Hady|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMackintosh, Kelly|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcNarry, Melitta|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRyde, Gemma|0000-0001-9117-0803en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHill, Denise M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVollaard, Niels B J|0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-04-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-04-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames12889-020-8444-z.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1471-2458en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12889-020-8444-z.pdfFulltext - Published Version816.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.