Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30725
Appears in Collections:Accounting and Finance Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Is There a Risk and Return Relation?
Author(s): McMillan, David
Fifield, Suzanne
McMillan, Fiona
Contact Email: david.mcmillan@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Stocks
return
risk
volatility
quantile
bull v’s bear
index
firm-level
Issue Date: 13-Feb-2020
Citation: McMillan D, Fifield S & McMillan F (2020) Is There a Risk and Return Relation?. European Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1724551
Abstract: Traditional finance theory posits that the relation between the risk and return of stocks is positive. Furthermore, investment practice is often based on the central contention that high (low) beta stocks earn higher (lower) returns. However, this fundamental relation is questioned by a several researchers who assert that the relation is, in fact, negative. Consequently, a growing body of research examines the nature of the stock return-risk relation using both market- and firm-level data. The results of this research are mixed. The purpose of this paper is to shed further light on this question by (i) examining both market- and firm-level price data; (ii) employing a battery of tests, including individual market, panel and quantile regressions; and (iii) analysing the nature of the relation during periods of high and low volatility and in bull and bear markets. The results indicate that there is no single robust relation between risk and return. Of note, the results suggest a positive relation when returns are high and during bear markets. Furthermore, the finding of a positive relation is stronger (i) at the market-level than the firm-level; and (ii) over long time periods. However, the analysis indicates that a negative relation exists at low return levels, during bull markets and, even more so, at the individual firm level. Overall, the results suggest that the risk-return relation is switching in nature and is primarily driven by changing risk preferences. Notably, a positive relation exists when macroeconomic risk plays a larger role.
DOI Link: 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1724551
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in European Journal of Finance on 13 Feb 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1724551.
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online
Licence URL(s): https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Whytock2020_Article_RegionalLand-useAndLocalManage.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version496.9 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2021-08-14    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.