Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30638
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelis, Giacomoen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T01:03:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-17T01:03:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30638-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: The main goal of Wedgwood’s book , expected to be the first instalment of a trilogy, is to defend the claim that the concept of rationality is normative. Among other things, on Wedgwood’s understanding, this is supposed to entail that ‘we always ought to be as we are rationally required to be’ (33). Since Wedgwood argues that a mentalist variety of internalism is true of rationality, in his picture the demands of rationality may be characterized as the demand that the agent is broadly coherent—that one’s way of thinking fit with the mental states and events present in one’s mind at the relevant times (4).en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_UK
dc.relationMelis G (2020) How Many Normative Notions of Rationality? A Critical Study of Wedgwood’s The Value of Rationality. Analysis, 80 (1), p. 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz088en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Analysis following peer review. The version of record Giacomo Melis, How Many Normative Notions of Rationality? A Critical Study of Wedgwood’s The Value of Rationality, Analysis, Volume 80, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages 174–185, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz088.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_UK
dc.titleHow Many Normative Notions of Rationality? A Critical Study of Wedgwood’s The Value of Rationalityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-12-10en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Value of Rationality Critical Notice.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/analys/anz088en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAnalysisen_UK
dc.citation.issn2386-3994en_UK
dc.citation.volume80en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage174en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Science project at the University of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.funderJohn Templeton Foundationen_UK
dc.author.emailgiacomo.melis@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date09/12/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000550146300020en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1494615en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-11-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-01-16en_UK
dc.subject.tagMind and Knowledgeen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMelis, Giacomo|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Science project at the University of Stirling|en_UK
local.rioxx.project58450|John Templeton Foundation|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000925en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-12-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-12-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2020-12-10|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameValue of Rationality Critical Notice.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1467-8284en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Value of Rationality Critical Notice.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version412.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.