Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30470
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacintyre, Annaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Paulineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Joanneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorPollock, Alexen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Joen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWoodhouse, Amyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Hannahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTorrens, Claireen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T01:01:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-19T01:01:16Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30470-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Despite robust evidence on health inequalities in adulthood, less attention has been paid to inequalities in adolescence. The aim of this overview was to examine systematic review (SR) evidence on the equity impact of population-level interventions intended to improve health, happiness and wellbeing for adolescents. Study Design: An overview (review of systematic reviews). Methods: Eleven electronic databases were systematically searched to identify SRs of population-level interventions for adolescent health. A secondary data analysis of socioeconomic inequality was conducted to identify whether SRs reported on primary studies in terms of disadvantage, by measures of socioeconomic status (SES) and by differential effects. Results: 35,310 review titles were screened; 566 full texts were retrieved and 140 SRs met the predefined selection criteria. Differential intervention effects were considered in 42/140 (30%) SRs, 18/140 (13%) reported primary studies using an SES measure and 16/140 (11%) explicitly reported differential effects. 15/140 SRs (11%) explicitly focused on socioeconomic inequalities; of these 4/15 reported differential intervention effects in more detail, 7/15 concluded there was insufficient primary evidence to identify the impact of interventions on socioeconomic inequalities and 4/15 planned to examine differential effects by SES, but this was not reported further. Conclusions: Our overview identifies that there is limited SR evidence on the equity impact of population-level interventions for adolescent health. Strengthening the evidence on whether interventions narrow or widen inequalities for adolescents must be a priority for public health research.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationMacintyre A, Campbell P, McLean J, Maxwell M, Pollock A, Williams J, Woodhouse A, Biggs H & Torrens C (2020) Socioeconomic inequalities and the equity impact of population-level interventions for adolescent health: An overview of systematic reviews. Public Health, 180, pp. 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.008en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Macintyre A, Campbell P, McLean J, Maxwell M, Pollock A, Williams J, Woodhouse A, Biggs H & Torrens C (2020) Socioeconomic inequalities and the equity impact of population-level interventions for adolescent health: An overview of systematic reviews. Public Health, 180, pp. 154-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.008 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectadolescentsen_UK
dc.subjectyoung peopleen_UK
dc.subjecthealth inequalitiesen_UK
dc.subjecthealth equityen_UK
dc.subjectoverviewen_UK
dc.titleSocioeconomic inequalities and the equity impact of population-level interventions for adolescent health: An overview of systematic reviewsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2021-01-08en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[MAIN_REVISED_TRACKED_23.10.19.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.008en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31923881en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePublic Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1476-5616en_UK
dc.citation.issn0033-3506en_UK
dc.citation.volume180en_UK
dc.citation.spage154en_UK
dc.citation.epage162en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailmargaret.maxwell@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date07/01/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScotCenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationChildren in Scotland Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScotCenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000519549600024en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85077377002en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1483127en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3883-2502en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-11-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-11-18en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MAIN_REVISED_TRACKED_23.10.19.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version608.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.