Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30466
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Adaptive thinking: Can adaptive dispositional attributions protect against the harmful effects of maladaptive situational attributions?
Author(s): Murray, Ross M
Coffee, Pete
Eklund, Robert C
Contact Email: peter.coffee@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Team-referent
Moderation
Stability
Globality
Collective efficacy
Issue Date: Mar-2020
Citation: Murray RM, Coffee P & Eklund RC (2020) Adaptive thinking: Can adaptive dispositional attributions protect against the harmful effects of maladaptive situational attributions?. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 47, Art. No.: 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101620
Abstract: Objectives The study was designed to examine if dispositional team-referent attributions moderate relationships between situational team-referent attributions and collective efficacy. Design In this cross-sectional design investigation, team athletes completed measures of dispositional team-referent attributions, situational team-referent attributions, and collective efficacy. Team outcome (i.e., win-loss status) was recorded. Method Athletes (N = 163) on sport teams (K = 17) completed a measure of dispositional team-referent attributions (i.e., attributional style). They also completed a measure of situational team-referent attributions in reference to their most recent team competition and a measure of collective efficacy in reference to their next upcoming team competition. Results Following team victory, simple slopes analysis revealed a moderating effect such that adaptive dispositional team-referent attributions appeared to protect against the effects of maladaptive situational team-referent attributions on collective efficacy. This trend was demonstrated across stability and globality attribution dimensions. Following team defeat, no significant interaction effects were observed. Conclusions The results suggest that developing adaptive dispositional attributions after success may protect athletes from experiencing deleterious effects of maladaptive situational attributions. Future research is needed to confirm these results and understand how these results can be applied to attributional retraining interventions in sport.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101620
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Murray RM, Coffee P & Eklund RC (2020) Adaptive thinking: Can adaptive dispositional attributions protect against the harmful effects of maladaptive situational attributions? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 47, Art. No.: 101620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101620 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Murray et al. (in press) PSE Nov 2019.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version715 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2021-05-15    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.