Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30251
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHall, Jenniferen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKay, Tessen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcConnell, Alison Ken_UK
dc.contributor.authorMansfield, Louiseen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T00:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-08T00:00:20Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30251-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Prolonged workplace sitting can harm employee health. Sit-stand desks are a potential workplace health initiative that might reduce and break up the time office-based employees spend sitting in the workplace. However, little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of providing sit-stand desks. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The present study sought stakeholder employee views surrounding sit-stand desk implementation within two UK-based non-profit organisations with open-plan offices. This paper draws on qualitative semi-structured interviews with 26 stakeholder employees and 65 days of participant observations. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and organisational cultural theory framed the study. Findings Stakeholders employees’ positioning of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative reflected their perceptions of the relationship between sit-stand desk provision, employee health and organisational effectiveness. Perceptions were shaped by the nature and context of the organisation and by occupation-specific processes. Relatively fixed (e.g. organisational structure) and modifiable (e.g. selecting products compatible with the environment) factors were found to restrict and facilitate the perceived feasibility of implementing sit-stand desks. Practical implications The findings offer several recommendations for workplaces to improve stakeholder employee attitudes towards sit-stand desk provision and to increase the ease and efficiency of implementation. Originality/value Whilst extant literature has tended to examine hypothetical views related to sit-stand desk provision, this study consulted relevant stakeholders following, and regarding, the sit-stand desk implementation process.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationHall J, Kay T, McConnell AK & Mansfield L (2019) Implementation of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative: stakeholder views. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 12 (5), pp. 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in International Journal of Workplace Health Management by Emerald. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026. This article is deposited under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emeraldinsight.com.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectQualitativeen_UK
dc.subjectOrganisational cultureen_UK
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_UK
dc.subjectAcceptabilityen_UK
dc.subjectFeasibilityen_UK
dc.subjectSedentary behaviouren_UK
dc.titleImplementation of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative: stakeholder viewsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Workplace Health Managementen_UK
dc.citation.issn1753-836Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn1753-8351en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage369en_UK
dc.citation.epage386en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderMacmillan Cancer Supporten_UK
dc.citation.date26/09/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrunel Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrunel Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85071613969en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1454769en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6452-3247en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-07-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-07-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-10-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHall, Jennifer|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKay, Tess|0000-0001-6452-3247en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcConnell, Alison K|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMansfield, Louise|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Macmillan Cancer Support|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011715en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-10-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2019-10-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHall-etal-IJWHM-2019.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1753-836Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hall-etal-IJWHM-2019.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version407.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.