Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30230
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKerrison, Robert Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Christianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGhanouni, Alexen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Trishen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacleod, Unaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Marken_UK
dc.contributor.authorRees, Colin Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Stephenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Lesley Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T00:00:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-04T00:00:54Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30230-
dc.description.abstractRapid reviews enable researchers to obtain a snapshot of what is known about a topic in a quick and systematic way, and are increasingly becoming an important aspect of the research literature. Despite this, there are currently no formal guidelines as to how best to conduct a rapid review. One method is to begin with a narrow search, and to expand the search successively, until the number of new/additional publications considered potentially eligible, based on title and abstract alone, is less than 1% of the total number of publications found overall (at this point, one can be reasonably confident that expanding the search is unlikely to yield any considerable new information). One of the main advantages of this method is that it provides a rationale for terminating the search at a given point, thereby making it less time-consuming than many other methods, which require the reviewer(s) to screen all articles found in response to a comprehensive list of search terms. In this case study, we describe our experience using the aforementioned method to review the literature investigating factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy (‘bowel scope’) screening use, and the lessons learned from it. We also describe the problems encountered in performing our review, and the steps implemented to overcome them. Finally, we provide suggestions for methodological improvements for the benefit of those considering conducting a rapid review in the future.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationKerrison RS, von Wagner C, Ghanouni A, Green T, Macleod U, Hughes M, Rees CJ, Duffy S & McGregor LM (2020) Lessons learned from conducting a rapid review: a case study examining factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy screening use. SAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine & Health. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529718164en_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine & Healthen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. The output will be available in UCL's repository.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectscreeningen_UK
dc.subjectsigmoidoscopyen_UK
dc.subjectscreensen_UK
dc.subjectcanceren_UK
dc.subjectpublicationsen_UK
dc.subjectcancer screeningen_UK
dc.subjectmedical scienceen_UK
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren_UK
dc.subjectEnglanden_UK
dc.titleLessons learned from conducting a rapid review: a case study examining factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy screening useen_UK
dc.typeResearch Reporten_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[conducting-rapid-review-factors-flexible-sigmoidoscopy-screening-use.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.4135/9781529718164en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.author.emaill.m.mcgregor@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.isbn9781529718164en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSouth Tyneside NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1459128en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-08-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-10-03en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeTechnical Reporten_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKerrison, Robert S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvon Wagner, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGhanouni, Alex|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreen, Trish|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacleod, Una|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHughes, Mark|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRees, Colin J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuffy, Stephen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University College London|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000765en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2270-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameconducting-rapid-review-factors-flexible-sigmoidoscopy-screening-use.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
conducting-rapid-review-factors-flexible-sigmoidoscopy-screening-use.pdfFulltext - Published Version511.37 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.