Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30213
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Impact of the 1918 Reform Act on the Politics of the West Midlands
Author(s): Cawood, Ian
Contact Email: ian.cawood@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: British political history
impact of the First World War
Representation of the People Act 1918
20th‐century party politics
20th‐century political culture
west midlands politics
Issue Date: Feb-2018
Citation: Cawood I (2018) The Impact of the 1918 Reform Act on the Politics of the West Midlands. Parliamentary History, 37 (1), pp. 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12339
Abstract: Despite the impact of the Representation of the People Act of 1918 on the political culture of the west midland region in the interwar years, the elements of continuity in the politics of the region are striking. The Labour Party failed to dislodge the Unionists’ political control in the region (with the exception of the Black Country) for most of the 1920s and 1930s, notwithstanding the presence of a significant industrial working‐class population in the bulk of the region's constituencies. The essay argues that the lack of a significant redistribution of seats in the region, in spite of wartime growth in all urban areas, enabled the well‐organised and well‐funded Unionist organisations controlled by Stanley Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain to adapt their cross‐class, non‐denominational message to appeal to the newly‐enlarged electorate. Although the Labour Party appeared on the brink of a breakthrough in the west midlands, owing to this ‘franchise factor’, the Unionists adapted better to the new age of mass communications and political sloganeering which replaced the Edwardian politics of confrontation and public meetings. The Representation of the People Act of 1918 may have changed the political culture of elections in Britain, but, in the west midlands at least, it did not alter the Unionists’ ability to manage the outcomes of the elections.
DOI Link: 10.1111/1750-0206.12339
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Parliamentary History proofs.pdfFulltext - Published Version228.85 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.