Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30094
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Danielleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorCritchlow, Nathanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-13T00:04:04Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-13T00:04:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-05en_UK
dc.identifier.other1227en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30094-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The United Kingdom (UK) fully-implemented standardised packaging for cigarettes and rolling tobacco on 20th May 2017. We explore adolescent’s awareness of, and responses to, standardised cigarette packaging in the UK after it became mandatory. Methods: Eight focus groups were conducted in schools in Scotland with 16–17 year-olds (n = 41), between November 2017 and November 2018, to explore awareness of, and responses to, standardised cigarette packaging. Unlike in Australia, where only straight-edged flip-top cigarette packs are permitted, in the UK standardised cigarette packs can have slim designs, and different edge types (straight, rounded or bevelled) and opening styles (flip-top or shoulder box). We explored how each of these pack formats was perceived. We also explored to what extent brand variant name differentiated cigarettes sold in standardised packaging. Results: Most participants were aware of standardised packaging without being shown pack stimuli. Standardised packs were considered embarrassing and off-putting, and the health warnings salient. Among the standardised packs shown, there was a preference for the slimmer pack, viewed as more discrete and the cigarettes potentially less harmful, and the shoulder box, considered cool and different. Participants were interested in some brand variant names on standardised packs (e.g. Legendary Black), particularly those they considered to imply coolness and sophistication. Conclusion: Adolescents consider standardised cigarette packs in the UK unappealing, and the warnings salient, two core aims of this measure. However, positive reactions to some of the standardised packs (slimmer pack, shoulder box), and variant names used, has implications for countries developing standardised packaging regulations.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMCen_UK
dc.relationMitchell D, Moodie C, Critchlow N & Bauld L (2019) Adolescents' perceptions of standardised cigarette packaging design and brand variant name post-implementation: A focus group study in Scotland [Adolescents' reactions to standardized packaging]. BMC Public Health, 19, Art. No.: 1227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7552-0en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectstandardised packagingen_UK
dc.subjectadolescent smokingen_UK
dc.subjectfocus groupsen_UK
dc.titleAdolescents' perceptions of standardised cigarette packaging design and brand variant name post-implementation: A focus group study in Scotlanden_UK
dc.title.alternativeAdolescents' reactions to standardized packagingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-019-7552-0en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31488096en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailnathan.critchlow@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date05/09/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000484967600006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85071750225en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1433877en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9145-8874en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-08-27en_UK
dc.description.refREF Compliant by Deposit in Stirling's Repositoryen_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-09-05en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mitchell et al. (2019).pdfFulltext - Published Version850.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.