Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30050
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFelsen, Gidonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNiker, Fayen_UK
dc.contributor.authorReiner, Peter B.en_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-03T15:53:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-03T15:53:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30050-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraphs: While the nature of autonomy has been debated for centuries, recent scholarship has been re-examining our conception(s) of autonomy in light of findings from the behavioral, cognitive, and neural sciences (Felsen and Reiner 2011; Blumenthal-Barby 2016). Blumenthal-Barby’s target article provides us with a timely and helpful framework for thinking about this issue in a systematic way, specifically in relation to the wide range of cognitive biases and heuristics that we employ in our decision making. Building on this, we wish to expand the framework beyond the article’s focus on the threat posed by biases and heuristics by suggesting that it is possible for at least some heuristics to promote autonomy. We hope to demonstrate this point by introducing the conceptual framework for a novel heuristic that we call pre-authorization. Blumenthal-Barby argues that biases and heuristics “pose a serious threat to autonomous decision-making and human agency” and that, consequently, efforts should be made to remove, mitigate, or counter them. While recognizing the autonomy-threatening potential of these ‘fast thinking’ mechanisms, as well as agreeing with the author about the types of cases in which this potential is likely to be actualized, we suggest that it does not capture the full range of interactions that are relevant to a balanced assessment of their impact on autonomy. If, as is widely acknowledged, at least some heuristics are adaptive responses to particular real-world decision-making situations (Gigerenzer 2008), the issue at hand becomes elucidating whether, and under what conditions, the cognitive influence of any particular heuristic is autonomy-threatening, autonomy-preserving, or even autonomy-promoting. Blumenthal-Barby focuses on the first of these categories; and, with respect to the component of absence of controlling or alienating influence, she contends that if the person’s attitude towards the influence is one of feeling controlled or alienated from her decision on account of the workings of a cognitive bias or heuristic, her autonomy is diminisheden_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_UK
dc.relationFelsen G, Niker F & Reiner PB (2016) Pre-Authorization: A Novel Decision-Making Heuristic That May Promote Autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16 (5), pp. 27-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1159761en_UK
dc.rights[Niker_OPC_on_JBB-final.pdf] This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in The American Journal of Bioethics on 3 May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15265161.2016.1159761en_UK
dc.rights[Pre-authorization_A_novel_decision-making-heuristic.pdf] This item has been embargoed. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectHeuristicen_UK
dc.subjectAutonomyen_UK
dc.subjectDecision makingen_UK
dc.titlePre-Authorization: A Novel Decision-Making Heuristic That May Promote Autonomyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-09-03en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Niker_OPC_on_JBB-final.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publicationen_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Pre-authorization_A_novel_decision-making-heuristic.pdf] Publisher requires permanent embargo.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15265161.2016.1159761en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27111363en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAmerican Journal of Bioethicsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1536-0075en_UK
dc.citation.issn1526-5161en_UK
dc.citation.volume16en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage27en_UK
dc.citation.epage29en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Warwicken_UK
dc.author.emailfay.niker@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/04/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Coloradoen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of British Columbiaen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000374911100009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84964712062en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1437316en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-02-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-09-03en_UK
dc.subject.tagLegal, Moral and Political Philosophyen_UK
dc.subject.tagMind and Knowledgeen_UK
dc.subject.tagBehavioural Neuroscienceen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFelsen, Gidon|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNiker, Fay|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReiner, Peter B.|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Warwick|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000741en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-09-03en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2019-09-03|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNiker_OPC_on_JBB-final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount2en_UK
local.rioxx.source1536-0075en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Niker_OPC_on_JBB-final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version396.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Pre-authorization_A_novel_decision-making-heuristic.pdfFulltext - Published Version293.4 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.