Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29974
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHartley, Chrisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoffee, Peteen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-08T00:04:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-08T00:04:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08en_UK
dc.identifier.other1724en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29974-
dc.description.abstractSocial support is an adaptive resource associated with lower levels of burnout in sport. The effects of social support on burnout have typically been demonstrated through (1) a main effects model (direct negative associations between social support and burnout) and (2) a stress-buffering model (social support buffering the negative effects of stress on burnout). While both models provide insights into functional adaptations to burnout and stress in sport, evidence for significant main and stress-buffering effects are inconsistent. Reasons for this is include: (1) testing of a singular perspective of support in empirical research, and (2) a lack of specificity when analyzing social support and burnout (e.g., adoption of global-level analyses). To address this, the purpose of the study was to test differing perspectives of social support (perceived availability of support and received support) in regards to the main and stress-buffering effects of dimensions of social support (emotional, esteem, informational, and tangible) on dimensions of burnout (reduced sense of accomplishment, devaluation, emotional and physical exhaustion). Cross-sectional data were collected from 222 athletes. Moderated hierarchical regression analyses revealed that: (1) higher levels of stress were associated with higher levels of burnout (all dimensions); (2) higher levels of perceived availability of support were associated with lower levels of reduced sense of accomplishment and devaluation (with the exception of perceived availability of emotional support upon devaluation), and (3) perceived availability of emotional support buffered the negative effects of high stress upon devaluation. There were no significant main or interactive effects for any dimensions of received support. The significant interaction suggests that higher levels of perceived availability of emotional support may result in a functional adaptation to higher stress such that individuals may be protected from higher levels of devaluation of sport.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_UK
dc.relationHartley C & Coffee P (2019) Perceived and Received Dimensional Support: Main and Stress-Buffering Effects on Dimensions of Burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Art. No.: 1724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01724en_UK
dc.rights© 2019 Hartley and Coffee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectperceived availability of supporten_UK
dc.subjectreceived supporten_UK
dc.subjectstressen_UK
dc.subjectsport psychologyen_UK
dc.subjectmoderationen_UK
dc.titlePerceived and Received Dimensional Support: Main and Stress-Buffering Effects on Dimensions of Burnouten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01724en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31428013en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFrontiers in Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1664-1078en_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date02/08/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000478590600001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85069432742en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1424019en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5531-4467en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1055-0052en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-07-11en_UK
dc.description.refREF Compliant by Deposit in Stirling's Repositoryen_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-08-07en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fpsyg-10-01724.pdfFulltext - Published Version914.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.