Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29847
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Breast cancer follow-up after a primary diagnosis: A confused picture
Author(s): Cruickshank, Susanne
Barber, Matthew
Contact Email: susanne.cruickshank@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Breast cancer
Follow-up
Aftercare
Guidelines
Recommendations
Best practice
Issue Date: Aug-2019
Citation: Cruickshank S & Barber M (2019) Breast cancer follow-up after a primary diagnosis: A confused picture. Breast, 46, pp. 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.010
Abstract: The follow-up care of people diagnosed with early breast cancer varies across the world. In the UK, services have evolved in an ad hoc way, with no standardized approach nationally. Some people are seen face to face at regular intervals, others are discharged at two years, while others are followed up over the telephone. This is creating confusion for patients as to what is best practice. The lack of evidence to support intensive surveillance is frequently cited as the main reason to reduce or indeed review the benefits of face to face clinical consultations in the hospital/community setting. In addition, a lack of specific recommendations in current guidelines compounds this. Although primary disease stage and treatment are strong indicators of survival, and time to recurrence (both local and distant) is extending, patterns of follow-up care in the UK differ depending on where you live. Yet, European and American guidelines, where survival is frequently reported as being better than the UK, continue to recommend follow-up at regular intervals as part of their overall management approach; to ensure new and changing ways of treating early breast cancer are initiated, managed and monitored accordingly. Indeed their guidelines are increasing rather than decreasing follow-up. While their health systems may differ, survival outcome reporting is not adjusted to reflect these differences. This paper provides an overview of breast cancer follow-up guidance across the world and opens up a debate about whether patterns of follow up care will affect survival outcomes into the future.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.010
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Cruickshank S & Barber M (2019) Breast cancer follow-up after a primary diagnosis: A confused picture. Breast, 46, pp. 97-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.010 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Review of breast cancer guidelines_Feb2019.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version220.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.