Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29845
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Punch, Samantha | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-06T00:08:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-06T00:08:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29845 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper considers why age and generation tend not to be recognised as social variables in the same way that gender, ethnicity and class are mainstreamed within Social Science disciplines. It questions why the concept of the generational order is not always integral to either Childhood Studies or the related sub-disciplines, such as Children’s Geographies. It begins from a starting point that Childhood Studies is generally a multi-disciplinary field but seems stuck from moving forward conceptually. The politics of Childhood Studies can result in sub-disciplinary silos rather than working in a more interdisciplinary way. The politics of childhood in society have progressed in terms of children’s rights and participation yet the theoretical development of children’s agency has been stuck. The paper discusses the lack of extensive empirical investigation of the generational order, suggesting that ‘generational orderings’ may be a more dynamic way to engage with processes of generationing. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) | en_UK |
dc.relation | Punch S (2020) Why have generational orderings been marginalised in the social sciences including childhood studies?. Childrens Geographies, 18 (2), pp. 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1630716 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Children’s Geographies on 17 Jun 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14733285.2019.1630716 | en_UK |
dc.subject | Childhood | en_UK |
dc.subject | child–adult relations | en_UK |
dc.subject | childhood studies | en_UK |
dc.subject | intergenerationality | en_UK |
dc.subject | generational order | en_UK |
dc.subject | children’s agency | en_UK |
dc.title | Why have generational orderings been marginalised in the social sciences including childhood studies? | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2020-06-18 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Punch paper generational orderings for childrens geogs final submitted 15 March 2019.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14733285.2019.1630716 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Children's Geographies | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1473-3277 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1473-3285 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 128 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 140 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.author.email | s.v.punch@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 17/06/2019 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000472317100001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85067605361 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1406790 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-9741-0978 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-05-23 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-05-23 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2019-07-05 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Punch, Samantha|0000-0001-9741-0978 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2020-06-18 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-06-17 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-06-18| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Punch paper generational orderings for childrens geogs final submitted 15 March 2019.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1473-3285 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Punch paper generational orderings for childrens geogs final submitted 15 March 2019.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 391.49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.