|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport eTheses|
|Title:||Inter-Day Reliability and Feasibility of an In-Shoe Plantar Pressure System for the Measurement of Balance Variability in Healthy, Non-Concussed Athletes|
Sport Concussion Assessment Tool
Modified Balance Error Scoring System
|Publisher:||University of Stirling|
|Abstract:||Introduction: Sport-related concussion research has gained traction, as college and university athletes make up 1/3 of reported concussions. Nearly 50% of reported concussions are diagnosed in American football players. Current diagnostic and monitoring tools in place include undergoing expensive brain scans, or completing the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5). The SCAT5 tool is universally utilised for recognizing and monitoring the symptomatology of concussions, but currently lacks a sensitive, objective measure of balance disturbances. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate in-shoe plantar pressure systems as a reliable, feasible, and objective measure of balance disturbance. Additionally the study sought to determine relationships between in-shoe plantar pressure systems measurements and SCAT5 symptom evaluations. Methods: Healthy, non-concussed participants (N = 17) from the University of Stirling American football team (23 ± 6 years old) were recruited to the lab for two visits, 1 week apart. To test inter-day reliability and repeatability of in-shoe plantar pressure systems’ measurements, each participant completed SCAT5 and a balance test on both visits, using the Pedar-X® system. The balance test consisted of 4 stances: stances 1 and 3 were bilateral, and stances 2 and 4 were unilateral. In addition, stances 1 and 2 were completed with eyes open, whereas stances 3 and 4 were completed with eyes closed. Results: Symptom count (visit 1: 3±4; visit 2: 4±5) and severity (visit 1: 5±7; visit 2: 6±7) reported from SCAT5. Balance measurements, in millimeters, from visit 1 (stance 1: 3.6±4.0; stance 2: 7.1±5.0; stance 3: 4.0±4.9; stance 4: 16.1±10.8) and visit 2 (stance 1: 4.7±6.1; stance 2: 7.6±7.6; stance 3: 5.7±7.7; stance 4: 14.8±10.0) recorded by Pedar-X®. Pedar-X® had moderately acceptable CVs (18-24%) for stances 1, 2 and 4, and had excellent inter-day repeatability for stances 2 and 4 (ICC: 0.854, 0.857; p<0.05). There was no significant difference between visit 1 and visit 2 Pedar-X® balance measurements (t-test: p>0.05). Pedar-X® had a strong correlation (PCC - r-value: 0.605-0.787, p<0.05 and Linear Regression - r-value: 0.27-0.40, p<0.05) with SCAT5 evaluated symptomatology. Conclusion: This study has shown that Pedar-X® has moderate inter-day, intra-participant reliability, and excellent inter-day repeatability. Specifically stance 4 measurements have a strong correlation with SCAT5 symptom evaluations and have a positive linear correlation, indicating the ability to detect naturally occurring balance variance among participants.|
|Type:||Thesis or Dissertation|
|Final Thesis.pdf||Inter-Day Reliability and Feasibility of an In-Shoe Plantar Pressure System for the Measurement of Balance Variability in Healthy, Non-Concussed Athletes||2.27 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Abstract.pdf||Thesis Abstract||508.79 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.