Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29588
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Device-measured Desk-based Occupational Sitting Patterns and Stress (hair cortisol and perceived stress)
Author(s): Ryde, Gemma
Dreczkowski, Gillian
Gallagher, Iain
Chesham, Ross
Gorely, Trish
Contact Email: gemma.ryde@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Sitting
sedentary
stress
poor mental health
workplace
hair cortisol
Issue Date: 1-Jun-2019
Citation: Ryde G, Dreczkowski G, Gallagher I, Chesham R & Gorely T (2019) Device-measured Desk-based Occupational Sitting Patterns and Stress (hair cortisol and perceived stress). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (11), Art. No.: 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111906
Abstract: Background: Stress and poor mental health are significant issues in the workplace and are a major cause of absenteeism and reduce productivity. Understanding what might contribute towards employee stress is important for managing mental health in this setting. Physical activity has been shown to be beneficial to stress but less research has addressed the potential negative impact of sedentary behaviour such as sitting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the relationship between device-measured occupational desk-based sitting patterns and stress (hair cortisol levels (HCL), as a marker of chronic stress and self-reported perceived stress (PS)). Methods: Employees were recruited from four workplaces located in Central Scotland with large numbers of desk-based occupations. Seventy-seven participants provided desk-based sitting pattern data (desk-based sitting time/day and desk-based sit-to-stand transitions/day), a hair sample and self-reported perceived stress. HCL were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and PS using the Cohen Self-Perceived Stress Scale. Linear regression models were used to test associations between desk-based sitting time/day, desk-based sit-to-stand transitions/day, HCL and PS. Results: There were no associations between any of the desk-based sitting measures and either HCL or PS. Conclusion. Desk-based sitting patterns in the workplace may not be related to stress when using HCL as a biomarker or PS. The relationship between sitting patterns and stress therefore requires further investigation.
DOI Link: 10.3390/ijerph16111906
Rights: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-16-01906.pdfFulltext - Published Version297.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.