|Appears in Collections:||Communications, Media and Culture Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The limits of Big Data for analyzing reading|
Critical Code Studies
|Citation:||Rowberry S (2019) The limits of Big Data for analyzing reading. Participations, 16 (1), pp. 237-257. http://www.participations.org/Volume%2016/Issue%201/12.pdf|
|Abstract:||Companies including Jellybooks and Amazon have introduced analytics to collect, analyze and monetize the user’s reading experience. Ebook apps and hardware collect implicit data about reading including progress and speed as well as encouraging readers to share more data through social networks. These practices generate large data sets with millions, if not billions of data points. For example, a copy of the King James Bible on the Kindle features over two million shared highlights. The allure of big data suggests that these metrics can be used at scale to gain a better understanding of how readers interact with books. While data collection practices continue to evolve, it is unclear how the metrics relate to the act of reading. For example, Kindle software tracks which words a reader looks up, but cannot distinguish between accidental look-ups, or otherwise link the act to the reader’s comprehension. In this article, I analyze patent filings and ebook software source code to assess the disconnect between data collection practices and the act of reading. The metrics capture data associated with software use rather than reading and therefore offer a poor approximation of the reading experience and must be corroborated by further data.|
|Rights:||Publisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Participations with the following policy: Copyright will always remain with authors, who are free to republish submissions, providing only that a proper acknowledgement of prior publication in Participations is included. We are happy for work to be placed in institutional repositories or individuals' websites on the same basis of acknowledgement. This article was published in Participations May 2019 (Volume 16, Issue 1, pp. 237-257 ): http://www.participations.org/Volume%2016/Issue%201/12.pdf|
|12.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||1.16 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.