Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29554
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRobinson, Gemma-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Hannah-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-23T08:35:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29554-
dc.description.abstractThis study redresses the scarcity of critical engagement with poetry in performance. My case studies are ‘black British poets’. I argue that the poet’s use of voice, gesture, presence, breath, prosody, improvisation, introductions, commentary and asides can be analysed as part of live writing. I demonstrate that the analysis of poetry in performance requires multiple methodologies and analytical approaches. I provide a correction to existing models and approaches to analysing poetry in performance by selecting methodology in response to the poet’s work and the contexts and heritages that inform their practice. I use ‘live writing’ as a lens that can be applied to all poetry performances, from the poet who quietly reads to the poet who recites whilst dancing. This study reveals that performing poetry is a psychophysical act that engages the poet’s entire (a)liveness. The first contextualising chapters consider the place of performance within British poetry as a whole, and how labels such as ‘spoken word’ and ‘fixed-identity’ can be used to exclude. ‘Live writing’ is discussed in relation to poststructuralism, the avant-garde and black British poetry. Chapter two, “Ways of Listening” demonstrates how a legacy of analysis founded on Saussure’s differentiation between langue and parole has impacted literary criticism and ways of listening, revealing that even recent analyses of poetry in performance re-prioritise the page. Finally, in chapter three, the potential meanings and origins of ‘British spoken word voice’ are considered and its attributes analysed using pitch-tracking software. Drawing on methodology from literary criticism, performance studies, sociolinguistics and musicology, the second half of this study is dedicated to analyses of live writing by Salena Godden, David J and Lemn Sissay. I analyse their work via the aesthetics and histories of hip hop, oral literature, Brechtian theatre, and Geneva Smitherman’s discussion of black semantics, specifically ‘talk-singing’ and ‘Signifyin’. Godden and David J are influential British poets whose work has not previously been analysed within or outside of academia. Lemn Sissay has been more widely discussed; I provide a unique contribution by analysing his use of gesture and voice, asides and commentary (or ‘performed palimpsests’) in relation to Bertolt Brecht’s writings on defamiliarisation. The study concludes with a discussion of Sissay’s The Report that refocuses my use of the phrase ‘live writing’.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectperformance poetryen_GB
dc.subjectspoken worden_GB
dc.subjectBlack Britishen_GB
dc.subjectlive writingen_GB
dc.subjectprosodyen_GB
dc.subjectLemn Sissayen_GB
dc.subjectSalena Goddenen_GB
dc.subjectDavid J.en_GB
dc.subjectBritish Libraryen_GB
dc.subjectperformance analysisen_GB
dc.subjectMalika Bookeren_GB
dc.subject.lcshAuthors, Black Great Britainen_GB
dc.subject.lcshPoetry Black authors.en_GB
dc.subject.lcshPerformance poetryen_GB
dc.titleLive Writing: A Psychophysical Approach to the Analysis of Black British Poetry in Performanceen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2020-05-22-
dc.rights.embargoreasonI am publishing articles from the thesis.en_GB
dc.contributor.funderAHRCen_GB
dc.author.emailsilva_danca@yahoo.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2020-05-23en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2020-05-23-
Appears in Collections:Literature and Languages eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LiveWritingHSilvaammendmentsfinal.pdfLive Writing: A Psychophysical Approach to the Analysis of Black British Poetry in Performance96.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.