Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShore, Colinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHubbard, Gillen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGorely, Trishen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Angusen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPolson, Roben_UK
dc.contributor.authorGalloway, S Den_UK
dc.description.abstractBackground: Exercise Referral Schemes (ERS) are prescribed programmes aimed at tackling physical inactivity and associated non-communicable disease. Inconsistencies in reporting, recording and delivering ERS make it challenging to identify what works, why, and for whom. Methods: PRISMA guided this narrative review of reviews. Fifteen electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews of ERS. Reviewers applied inclusion criteria and quality assessed via the AMSTAR tool. Data on uptake, attendance and adherence were extracted. Results: Eleven reviews met the inclusion criteria. AMSTAR quality was medium. Definitions of uptake varied within reviews. Uptake ranged from 35%-81%. Groups reported as more likely to take up ERS included, (i) females and (ii) older adults. Attendance was defined variably but ranged from 12%-49%. Men were more likely to attend ERS. Effect of medical diagnosis upon uptake and attendance was inconsistent. Exercises prescribed were unreported and therefore, adherence to exercise prescriptions was unreported. The influence of theoretically-informed approaches on uptake, attendance and adherence was generally lacking, however, self-determination, peer support and supervision support were reported as influencing attendance. Conclusions: There was insufficient reporting across studies about uptake, attendance and adherence. Complex interventions like ERS require consistent definitions, recording and reporting of these key facets, but this is not evident from the existing literature.en_UK
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_UK
dc.relationShore C, Hubbard G, Gorely T, Hunter A, Polson R & Galloway SD (2019) Insufficient Reporting of Factors Associated with Exercise Referral Scheme Uptake, Attendance, and Adherence: A Systematic Review of Reviews. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 16 (8), pp. 667-676.
dc.rightsAccepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2019, 16 (8), pp. 667-676. © Human Kinetics, Inc.en_UK
dc.subjectphysical activityen_UK
dc.subjectexercise prescriptionen_UK
dc.subjectprogram evaluationen_UK
dc.titleInsufficient Reporting of Factors Associated with Exercise Referral Scheme Uptake, Attendance, and Adherence: A Systematic Review of Reviewsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Physical Activity and Healthen_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the Highlands and Islandsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHighlands and Islands Enterpriseen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the Highlands and Islandsen_UK
dc.description.refREF Compliant by Deposit in Stirling's Repositoryen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RoR JPAH PDF.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version279.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.