|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Bodies of knowledge: connecting the evidence bases on physical activity and health inequalities|
social determinants of health
|Citation:||Kay T (2016) Bodies of knowledge: connecting the evidence bases on physical activity and health inequalities. International Journal of Sport Policy, 8 (4), pp. 539-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2016.1228690|
|Abstract:||This paper addresses the absence of social science perspectives in physical activity policy guidance. Physical activity is a universal health focus, a priority for global, regional and national agencies acting on public health (e.g. the World Health Organisation; WHO Regional Office for Europe; Public Health England). Current UK guidance about being physically active was published in 2011, during a period of intense economic downturn and ‘austerity’ welfare. Physical activity is known to be lowest among sectors of the population at the lower end of the social gradient, making marginalised and disadvantaged groups priorities for initiatives to raise activity levels. Although much emphasis was given to the robust scientific underpinning of the 2011 guidance, it failed to engage with either the national or global debate around health inequalities, and gave no consideration to the social processes affecting health. This paper considers this omission. It first overviews patterns of health inequalities and explains the potential contribution of physical activity to addressing them. It then reviews the content of UK physical activity guidance, examines the role of health behaviour research in informing them, and suggests a number of ways in which social science knowledge could have enhanced its analysis. The paper then considers the process of knowledge production which informed the guidance, and considers the value of incorporating research into the social determinants of health (SDH) into the evidence base that informs physical activity guidance. It concludes with suggestions about how this might be done.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Kay-IJSPP-2016.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||1.6 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.