Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29019
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: A qualitative study exploring the ethical implications
Author(s): Lorimer, Karen
Gray, Cindy M
Hunt, Kate
Wyke, Sally
Anderson, Annie
Benzeval, Michaela
Keywords: Body Mass Index
Individualise Feedback
Body Mass Index Measure
Ethical Imperative
Blood Result
Issue Date: 27-Jan-2011
Citation: Lorimer K, Gray CM, Hunt K, Wyke S, Anderson A & Benzeval M (2011) Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: A qualitative study exploring the ethical implications. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, Art. No.: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-10
Abstract: Background: There is a growing ethical imperative to feedback research results to participants but there remains a striking lack of empirical research on how people respond to individualised feedback. We sought to explore longitudinal study participants' response to receiving individual written feedback of weight-related and blood results, and to consider the balance of harms against benefits. Methods: A qualitative study with face-to-face and telephone interviews conducted with 50 men and women who had participated in the fifth and most recent wave of the cohort study 'West of Scotland Twenty-07' and received a feedback letter containing body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin A1c(HbA 1c) results. Results: Expectations of, and response to, the feedback of their individual results varied. Whilst half of the participants were on the whole 'pleased' with their results or held neutral views, half reported negative responses such as 'shock' or 'concern', particularly in relation to the weight-related results. Participants who were overweight and obese used the most negative language about their results, with some being quite distressed and reporting feelings of powerlessness, low self-image and anxiety over future health. Nevertheless, some people reported having implemented lifestyle changes in direct response to the feedback, resulting in significant weight-loss and/or dietary improvements. Others reported being motivated to change their behaviour. Age and gender differences were apparent in these narratives of behaviour change. Conclusions: The potential harm caused to some participants may be balanced against the benefit to others. More evaluation of the impact of the format, content and means of individualised feedback of research findings in non-trial studies is required given the growing ethical imperative to offer participants a choice of receiving their results, and the likelihood that a high percentage will choose to receive them.
DOI Link: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-10
Rights: © Lorimer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Response To Written Feedback Of Clinical Data Within A Longitudinal Study.pdfFulltext - Published Version320.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.