Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28934
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Ross Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoffee, Peteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEklund, Robert Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorArthur, Calum Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-07T10:35:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-07T10:35:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28934-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Investigate (a) the effects of attributional consensus on interpersonal outcomes and performance, (b) the effects of attribution type (i.e., adaptive/maladaptive) on performance, and (c) the interactive effects between attributional consensus and attribution type on performance. Design: Across two studies (i.e., vignette and behavioural experiments), independent samples t-tests were used to examine the main effects of attributional consensus on interpersonal outcomes. A 2 (attributional consensus: high, low) x 2 (attribution type: adaptive, maladaptive) x 2 (time: pre, post) ANOVA with repeated measures on the last factor was used to analyse the main and interaction effects of attributional consensus and attribution type on performance. Method: In Study 1, participants (N = 100) read a vignette describing a hypothetical situation in which they and their partner agreed or disagreed over an adaptive or maladaptive attribution. They then completed measures of conflict and cohesion. In Study 2, participants (N = 56) completed an experiment in which they performed a dart throwing task with a partner (a confederate) and were subsequently told they failed the task. After selecting an adaptive or maladaptive attribution, the confederate then agreed or disagreed with the participant. Measures of conflict, cohesion, social identity, and performance were then taken. Results: High attributional consensus led to lower levels of conflict and higher levels of cohesion and social identity. Further, regardless of attribution type, high attributional consensus led to better performance. Conclusion: Overall the results provide evidence for the positive effects of high attributional consensus on interpersonal and performance outcomes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationMurray RM, Coffee P, Eklund RC & Arthur CA (2019) Attributional consensus: The importance of agreement over causes for team performance to interpersonal outcomes and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, pp. 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.03.001en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Murray RM, Coffee P, Eklund RC & Arthur CA (2019) Attributional consensus: The importance of agreement over causes for team performance to interpersonal outcomes and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, pp. 219-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.03.001 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectTeam-referent attributionsen_UK
dc.subjectDisagreeen_UK
dc.subjectAdaptiveen_UK
dc.subjectMaladaptiveen_UK
dc.titleAttributional consensus: The importance of agreement over causes for team performance to interpersonal outcomes and performanceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-09-09en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Murray-etal-inpress-2019.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 18 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.03.001en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePsychology of Sport and Exerciseen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-0292en_UK
dc.citation.volume43en_UK
dc.citation.spage219en_UK
dc.citation.epage225en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailpeter.coffee@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date08/03/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFlorida State Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUK Sporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000472693000025en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85062893791en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1240031en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1055-0052en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-03-04en_UK
dc.description.refREF Compliant by Deposit in Stirling's Repositoryen_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-03-06en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Murray-etal-inpress-2019.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version350.32 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2020-09-08    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.