Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28914
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Cognitive foundations of cooperation revisited: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012, 2014)
Author(s): Myrseth, Kristian Ove R
Wollbrant, Conny E
Contact Email: conny.wollbrant@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: co-operation
intuition
decision times
pro-social behaviour
Issue Date: Aug-2017
Citation: Myrseth KOR & Wollbrant CE (2017) Cognitive foundations of cooperation revisited: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012, 2014). Commentary on: Rand, D. G. et al. Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nat. Commun. 5:3677 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4677 (2014) and Rand, D. G. et al. Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature. 489:427-430 doi: 10.1038/nature11467 (2012).. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 69, pp. 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.01.005
Abstract: We show that Rand et al. (2012, 2014)—who argue that cooperation is intuitive—provide an incorrect interpretation of their own data. They make the mistake of inferring intuition from relative decision times alone, without taking into account absolute decision times. We re-examine their data and find that the vast majority of their responses are slow, exceeding four seconds, even in time-pressure treatments intended to promote intuitive responses. Further, a plot of the average cooperation rates by decision time fails to yield a monotonically decreasing relationship. However, among the few decisions that were relatively fast, there appears to be a positive—not negative—association between decision time and cooperation. We conclude that the data presented by Rand et al. (2012, 2014) fail to provide evidence for the hypothesis that cooperation is intuitive. If anything, their data indicate the opposite.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.socec.2017.01.005
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2214804317300058-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version520.76 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.