Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28812
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCahill, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-14T16:33:07Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-14T16:33:07Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-16en_UK
dc.identifier.otherCD005353en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28812-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Selective type 1 cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonists may assist with smoking cessation by restoring the balance of the endocannabinoid system, which can be disrupted by prolonged use of nicotine. They also seek to address many smokers' reluctance to persist with a quit attempt because of concerns about weight gain. Objectives: To determine whether selective CB1 receptor antagonists (currently rimonabant and taranabant) increase the numbers of people stopping smoking To assess their effects on weight change in successful quitters and in those who try to quit but fail. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Review Group specialized register for trials, using the terms ('rimonabant' or 'taranabant') and 'smoking' in the title or abstract, or as keywords. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, using major MESH terms. We acquired electronic or paper copies of posters of preliminary trial results presented at the American Thoracic Society Meeting in 2005, and at the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco European Meeting 2006. We also attempted to contact the authors of ongoing studies of rimonabant, and Sanofi Aventis (manufacturers of rimonabant). The most recent search was in January 2011. Selection criteria: Types of studies Randomized controlled trials Types of participants Adult smokers Types of interventions Selective CB1 receptor antagonists, such as rimonabant and taranabant. Types of outcome measures The primary outcome is smoking status at a minimum of six months after the start of treatment. We preferred sustained cessation rates to point prevalence, and biochemically verified cessation to self-reported quitting. We regarded smokers who drop out or are lost to follow up as continuing smokers. We have noted any adverse effects of treatment. A secondary outcome is weight change associated with the cessation attempt. Data collection and analysis: Two authors checked the abstracts for relevance, and attempted to acquire full trial reports. One author extracted the data, and a second author checked them. Main results: We found three trials which met our inclusion criteria, covering 1567 smokers (cessation: STRATUS-EU and STRATUS-US), and 1661 quitters (relapse prevention: STRATUS-WW). At one year, the pooled risk ratio (RR) for quitting with rimonabant 20 mg was 1.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.05). No significant benefit was demonstrated for rimonabant at 5 mg dosage. Adverse events included nausea and upper respiratory tract infections. In the relapse prevention trial, smokers who had quit on the 20 mg regimen were more likely to remain abstinent on either active regimen than on placebo; the RR for the 20 mg maintenance group was 1.29 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.57), and for the 5 mg maintenance group 1.30 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.59). There appeared to be no significant benefit of maintenance treatment for the 5 mg quitters. One trial of taranabant was not included in our meta-analyses, as it followed participants only until end of treatment; at eight weeks it found no benefit for treatment over placebo, with an OR of 1.2 (90% CI 0.6 to 2.5). For rimonabant, weight gain was reported to be significantly lower among the 20 mg quitters than in the 5 mg or placebo quitters. During treatment, overweight or obese smokers tended to lose weight, while normal weight smokers did not. For taranabant, weight gain was significantly lower for 2-8 mg versus placebo at the end of eight weeks of treatment. In 2008, post-marketing surveillance led the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) to require Sanofi Aventis to withdraw rimonabant, because of links to mental disorders. The development of taranabant was also suspended by Merck & Co because of unacceptable adverse events. Authors' conclusions: From the trial reports available, rimonabant 20 mg may increase the chances of quitting approximately 1 1/2-fold. The evidence for rimonabant in maintaining abstinence is inconclusive. Rimonabant 20 mg may moderate weight gain in the long term. Taranabant 2-8 mg may moderate weight gain, at least in the short term. In 2008, development of both rimonabant and taranabant was discontinued by the manufacturers.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCochrane Collaborationen_UK
dc.relationCahill K & Ussher M (2011) Cannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonists for smoking cessation. <i>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</i>, 2011 (3), Art. No.: CD005353. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005353.pub4en_UK
dc.rightsThis review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review. This is the reference to the original version of this review: Hay K, Ussher MH, Lancaster T. Cannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonists (rimonabant) for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD005353. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005353 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005353en_UK
dc.titleCannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonists for smoking cessationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/14651858.CD005353.pub4en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid21412887en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-493Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume2011en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288458200018en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79953283519en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid498842en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-03-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-02-14en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCahill, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-02-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-02-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCahill_et_al-2011-Cochrane_Database_of_Systematic_Reviews.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cahill_et_al-2011-Cochrane_Database_of_Systematic_Reviews.pdfFulltext - Published Version334.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.