Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28674
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorI'Anson, Johnen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-01T01:00:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-01T01:00:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.other7082en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28674-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate how pharmacy students negotiate the pedagogical demands of a revised pharmacy curriculum and to understand students’ learning practices and to explore the impact of assessment and feedback regimes in one School of Pharmacy. Methods: Using qualitative methodology and artefacts to explore pharmacy students’ learning in order to understand their learning practices in negotiating a field of inquiry as well as identifying difficulties encountered along the way. Data collection took the form of individual semi-structured interviews with undergraduate pharmacy students. Participants were asked to select three artefacts (a photograph, an object, a song, a picture or something else) that represented what learning as a pharmacy student meant to them and bring that along to an interview. Data were analyzed thematically using mind-mapping and subsequently, Law’s25,26 concepts of practices and collateral realities and Ingold’s12,12 concept of dwelling were used to make sense of the analysis. Results: Findings were grouped into five distinct themes: study practices or strategies adopted, rituals associated with learning and studying, pharmacy knowledge, motivation for learning and ways of learning. In the following section, each of these identified thematics is summarized, with illustrations from the data given. The affective dimensions of learning was a strong emergent theme throughout the data. Conclusions: The use of artefacts in the research process afforded in-depth insight into the specific study practices adopted by a group of pharmacy students. Findings from this study suggest that qualitative methods can be useful in surfacing students’ practice as regards strategies deployed, and difficulties faced in their negotiation of new pharmacy curricula.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAACP - American Association of Colleges of Pharmacyen_UK
dc.relationEdwards R & I'Anson J (2020) Using artifacts and qualitative methodology to explore pharmacy students' learning practices. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84 (1), pp. 47-59, Art. No.: 7082. https://www.ajpe.org/doi/abs/10.5688/ajpe7082; https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7082en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, published by AACP - American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. The final published version is available at: https://www.ajpe.org/doi/abs/10.5688/ajpe7082en_UK
dc.subjectlearningen_UK
dc.subjectpharmacyen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative methodsen_UK
dc.subjectartefactsen_UK
dc.subjectpracticesen_UK
dc.titleUsing artifacts and qualitative methodology to explore pharmacy students' learning practicesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.5688/ajpe7082en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32292182en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Educationen_UK
dc.citation.issn1553-6467en_UK
dc.citation.issn0002-9459en_UK
dc.citation.volume84en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage47en_UK
dc.citation.epage59en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ajpe.org/doi/abs/10.5688/ajpe7082en_UK
dc.author.emailjohn.ianson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/02/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAston Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEducationen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000517756600008en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85080909358en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1102803en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7605-2403en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-10-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-31en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorEdwards, Ruth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorI'Anson, John|0000-0001-7605-2403en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-02-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-02-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-02-25|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameajpe7082.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0002-9459en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ajpe7082.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version2.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.