Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28426
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Andrade, Marisaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAngus, Kathrynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHastings, Gerarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorAngelova, Nikolinaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-19T01:01:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-19T01:01:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28426-
dc.description.abstractThe tobacco market has been transformed by the arrival of e-cigarettes and array of alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS). Public health has struggled to cope with these changes and clear divisions are apparent, but less is known about the tobacco industry (TI) response. This first empirical study to examine TI and independent ANDS companies' business strategies fills this gap. Primary data were collected through 28 elite interviews with senior/influential TI and independent stakeholders, triangulated with a documentary analysis of company reports, investor analyses, market research, and consultation responses (1022 documents). A deliberately emic analysis shows that tobacco multinationals were initially disconcerted by ANDS, but logic provided by the fiduciary imperative is enabling them to turn a potential threat into profitable opportunities. Interviewees argue market changes played to their strengths: customer links, expertise in nicotine, and enormous financial resources. This enabled portfolio diversification in which combustible and ANDS coexist; providing potential to develop robust scientific and regulatory positions and hope of retrieving corporate reputations. The principal threat for major tobacco players comes from the independent sector, which is prepared and able to satisfy bespoke consumer needs. Multinationals by contrast need to turn ANDS into a genuinely massmarket product appealing to its global customers. They are making progress. Given the continued buoyancy of the combustibles market, they have extensive resources to continue their efforts. Disruptive innovations are not unique to tobacco control. Equivalent technological solutions – with concomitant business opportunities − are emerging in obesity and alcohol fields with implications for public health.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en_UK
dc.relationde Andrade M, Angus K, Hastings G & Angelova N (2020) Hostage to fortune: an empirical study of the tobacco industry's business strategies since the advent of e-cigarettes. Critical Public Health, 30 (3), pp. 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1552778en_UK
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjecttobacco industry (TI)en_UK
dc.subjecttobacco harm reduction (THR)en_UK
dc.subjectelectronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes)en_UK
dc.subjectelectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)en_UK
dc.subjectbusiness strategiesen_UK
dc.titleHostage to fortune: an empirical study of the tobacco industry's business strategies since the advent of e-cigarettesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09581596.2018.1552778en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32536808en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCritical Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-3682en_UK
dc.citation.issn0958-1596en_UK
dc.citation.volume30en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage280en_UK
dc.citation.epage293en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.citation.date18/12/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000532295000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85058797943en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1075088en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-11-20en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-20en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-12-18en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectElectronic Cigarettes: Tobacco Industry Business Plans or Strategiesen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefN/Aen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorde Andrade, Marisa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAngus, Kathryn|0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHastings, Gerard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAngelova, Nikolina|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectN/A|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-12-18en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-12-18|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDeAndrade-etal-CPH-2020.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1469-3682en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DeAndrade-etal-CPH-2020.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.