Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28342
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHunter, Angus-
dc.contributor.advisorMacGregor, Lewis-
dc.contributor.authorNikolaou, Zacharias-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-05T12:32:57Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-05T12:32:57Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28342-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: There are a number of studies and systematic reviews suggesting potential chronic neurodegenerative effects of repetitive subconcussive head impacts. Indeed, most neuroimaging and some serum biomarker tests used in the literature generally present consistent evidence for negative effects of repetitive subconcussive head impacts. However, these tests have limited utility as side-line diagnostic tests. Purpose: Investigate whether two prospective side-line tests, sport concussion assessment tool 5 (SCAT 5) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have enough sensitivity to detect relatively small and transient electrophysiological and cognitive changes in American football players who are very prone to repetitive subconcussive head impacts. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effects of subconcussive head impacts on TMS and SCAT 5 performance by comparing contact with non-contact sport athletes. The secondary aim is to investigate the reproducibility and reliability of TMS and SCAT 5 in contact sport athletes. Methods: For the first section of the study, we assessed TMS and SCAT 5 measures on seventeen American football players (mean ±SD age: 23 ±7 years) and seventeen non-contact sport participants (mean ±SD age: 24 ±3 years) who were recruited for only one session. To assess the day-to-day reliability of each measure, the seventeen American football players were tested for a second time at least seven days following the first session. Results: Compared to the TMS day-to-day reliability analysis, SCAT 5 test scores presented poorer reproducibility and higher coefficients of variation (4–6% vs 10–66%, respectively). There were no significant differences in SCAT 5 test scores and corticospinal-silent period between contact and non-contact sport players. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate similar electrophysiological and SCAT 5 characteristics between American football players and non-contact sport athletes. Also the electrophysiological changes observed are supported by our highly reliable and reproducible inter-day TMS data.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectTMSen_GB
dc.subjectTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationen_GB
dc.subjectCorticospinal silent perioden_GB
dc.subjectSCAT5en_GB
dc.subjectElectrophysiological changesen_GB
dc.subjectNeurocognitive assessmenten_GB
dc.subject.lcshBrain--Concussionen_GB
dc.subject.lcshBrain Injury--Evaluationen_GB
dc.subject.lcshMagnetic brain stimulationen_GB
dc.subject.lcshFootball players--Health and hygieneen_GB
dc.titleElectrophysiological and SCAT 5 characteristics of contact vs non-contact sport athletesen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelMastersen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameMaster of Philosophyen_GB
dc.author.emailzackanw@gmail.comen_GB
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport eTheses



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.