Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Access to primary mental health care for hard-to-reach groups: from 'silent suffering' to 'making it work'
Author(s): Kovandzic, Marija
Chew-Graham, Carolyn
Reeve, Joanne
Edwards, Suzanne
Peters, Sarah
Edge, Dawn
Aseem, Saadia
Gask, Linda
Dowrick, Christopher
Contact Email:
Keywords: Mental health
Hard-to-reach groups
Primary care
Issue Date: 31-Mar-2011
Date Deposited: 6-Nov-2018
Citation: Kovandzic M, Chew-Graham C, Reeve J, Edwards S, Peters S, Edge D, Aseem S, Gask L & Dowrick C (2011) Access to primary mental health care for hard-to-reach groups: from 'silent suffering' to 'making it work'. Social Science and Medicine, 72 (5), pp. 763-772.
Abstract: Equitable access to primary care for people with common mental health problems in the UK remains problematic. The experiences of people from hard-to-reach groups offer important insights into barriers to accessing care. In this study, we report on secondary analysis of qualitative data generated within seven previously-reported studies. Thirty-three of ninety-two available transcripts were re-analysed using a new heuristic of access, generated to frame narrative-based comparative case analysis. The remaining transcripts were used to triangulate the findings via a process of collaborative analysis between a secondary researcher, naïve to research findings of the original studies, and primary researchers involved in data generation and analysis within the original studies. This method provided a rich body of 'fine grain' insights into the ways in which problem formulation, help-seeking, use of services and perceptions of service quality are interlinked in a recursive and socially embedded matrix of inequitable access to primary mental health care. The findings indicate both extensive commonalities between experiences of people from different 'hard-to-reach groups', and considerable diversity within each group. An idiographic generalisation and aggregation of this variety of experiences points to one main common facilitator (communicated availability of acceptable mental health services) and two main common barriers (lack of effective information and multiple forms of stigma) to equitable access to primary mental health care. We conclude that there is a need to provide local care that is pluralistic, adaptive, holistic, resonant and socially conscious in order to ensure that equitable access to mental health services can become a reality.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.027
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kovandzic_Social_Science_and_Medicine_2011.pdfFulltext - Published Version660.09 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.