Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27987
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMavrodaris, Angeliqueen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhilp, Ianen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-18T00:02:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-18T00:02:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27987-
dc.description.abstractPurpose One in 14 people over 65 years suffer from dementia in the UK. Over 25 per cent are receiving antipsychotics, which cause increases in mortality and cerebrovascular events. The need for a reduction and the use of alternative supportive strategies has been advocated. Risperidone at six‐week intervals is the only antipsychotic licensed for treatment with regular review. The majority of management occurs at primary care level and in care homes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate antipsychotic prescribing practices and patient review in these settings. Design/methodology/approach In total, two surveys comprising questions addressing prescribing practices were developed and distributed electronically to all GP practices and care homes in Coventry and Warwickshire, West Midlands, England. Findings The majority of GPs (75 per cent) reported only “occasional” discontinuation of antipsychotics due to concerns at reducing drugs on their own, expectations of regulation from secondary care and resistance from care home staff. Poor reduction levels were reported in care homes, attributing low numbers to reluctance among GPs. History of cardiovascular risk factors did not appear to influence withdrawal. Only 40 per cent of GP practices maintained sole use of risperidone. At least six‐monthly reviews were reported by 63 per cent of GPs and 64 per cent of care homes, with very few conducting reviews at least three‐monthly. The importance of non‐pharmacological alternatives was emphasized, yet access was limited and highly resource‐dependent. Originality/value This study reveals the perspectives of staff delivering healthcare for people with dementia and behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Potentially inappropriate antipsychotic principles were reported. A lack of communication and uncertainty of roles was evident. The development of understandable guidelines for healthcare workers and care home staff managing behavioural issues in patients with dementia is necessary.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationMavrodaris A & Philp I (2013) Reducing antipsychotic prescriptions in primary care: A healthcare perspective. Journal of Public Mental Health, 12 (1), pp. 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465721311304258en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_UK
dc.subjectPrimary careen_UK
dc.subjectMedical treatmenten_UK
dc.subjectDrugsen_UK
dc.subjectDementiaen_UK
dc.subjectAlzheimer's diseaseen_UK
dc.subjectAntipsychoticsen_UK
dc.subjectPrescribingen_UK
dc.titleReducing antipsychotic prescriptions in primary care: A healthcare perspectiveen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Mavrodaris-Philp.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/17465721311304258en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Public Mental Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn2042-8731en_UK
dc.citation.issn1746-5729en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage32en_UK
dc.citation.epage42en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailian.philp@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/03/2013en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Warwicken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Warwicken_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84874794013en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid948189en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3972-6496en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-03-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-10-05en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMavrodaris, Angelique|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhilp, Ian|0000-0002-3972-6496en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2263-02-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMavrodaris-Philp.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1746-5729en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mavrodaris-Philp.pdfFulltext - Published Version166.76 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.