Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27986
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhilp, Ianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrainin, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Marion Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWard, Anthony Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorGillard, Patricken_UK
dc.contributor.authorShields, Alan Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorNorrving, Boen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-18T00:02:24Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-18T00:02:24Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27986-
dc.description.abstractBackground Long-term care for stroke survivors is fragmented and lacks an evidence-based, easy-to-use tool to identify persistent long-term problems among stroke survivors and streamline referral for treatment. We sought to develop a poststroke checklist (PSC) to help health care professionals identify poststroke problems amenable to treatment and subsequent referral. Methods An instrument development team, supported by measurement experts, international stroke experts, and poststroke care stakeholders, was created to develop a long-term PSC. A list of long-term poststroke problem areas was generated by an international, multidisciplinary group of stroke experts, the Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel. Using Delphi methods, a consensus was reached on which problem areas on the list were most important and relevant to include in a PSC. The instrument development team concurrently created the actual checklist, which provided example language about how to ask about poststroke problem areas and linked patient responses to a specific referral process. Results Eleven long-term poststroke problem areas were rated highly and consistently among stroke experts participating in the Delphi process (n = 12): secondary prevention, activities of daily living, mobility, spasticity, pain, incontinence, communication, mood, cognition, life after stroke, and relationship with caregiver. These problem areas were included in the long-term PSC. Conclusions The PSC was developed to be a brief and easy-to-use tool, intended to facilitate a standardized approach for health care providers to identify long-term problems in stroke survivors and to facilitate appropriate referrals for treatment.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationPhilp I, Brainin M, Walker MF, Ward AB, Gillard P, Shields AL & Norrving B (2013) Development of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivors. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 22 (7), pp. e173-e180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectStrokeen_UK
dc.subjectlong-term careen_UK
dc.subjectstroke rehabilitationen_UK
dc.subjectcontinuity of patient careen_UK
dc.subjectassessment of health care needsen_UK
dc.subjectreferral and consultationen_UK
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_UK
dc.titleDevelopment of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivorsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid23265778en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseasesen_UK
dc.citation.issn1052-3057en_UK
dc.citation.volume22en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spagee173en_UK
dc.citation.epagee180en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date21/12/2012en_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional listed co-author: Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel. Panel members are: L Abetz, S Blackburn, C Chen, C Diener, G Donnan, P Duncan, A Esquenazi, P Fayad, G Francisco, D Good, G Graham, B Kissela, D Leys, J Olver, J Stokes, K Sunnerhagen, T Wein, J Wissel, and R Zorowitz.en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Warwicken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLund Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000325874200027en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84886075751en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid948883en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3972-6496en_UK
dc.date.accepted2012-10-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-10-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-10-05en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhilp, Ian|0000-0002-3972-6496en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrainin, Michael|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWalker, Marion F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWard, Anthony B|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGillard, Patrick|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShields, Alan L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNorrving, Bo|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-10-05en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2018-10-05|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePhilp et al 2013.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1052-3057en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philp et al 2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version152.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.