Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27957
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawford Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHiscock, Rosemaryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThrasher, Jimen_UK
dc.contributor.authorReid, Garthen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-12T00:02:11Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-12T00:02:11Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-30en_UK
dc.identifier.othere019662en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27957-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To explore young adult smokers’ perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive. Design Cross-sectional online survey. Setting UK. Participants The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3% male and 71.6% white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16–34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes. Primary and secondary outcome measures Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning ‘Smoking kills’ and a green cigarette). Results Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61%). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53%), help if they decided to quit (52%), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53%) and supported having them in all packs (55%). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95% CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95% CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried). Conclusions Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationMoodie CS, Hiscock R, Thrasher J & Reid G (2018) Perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK: a cross-sectional online survey. BMJ Open, 8 (9), Art. No.: e019662. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019662en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectGeneral Medicineen_UK
dc.titlePerceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK: a cross-sectional online surveyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019662en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30185567en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue9en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNHS Health Scotlanden_UK
dc.citation.date05/09/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of South Carolinaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Health Scotlanden_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85069588000en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1031705en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-07-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-07-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-10-11en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoodie, Crawford S|0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHiscock, Rosemary|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThrasher, Jim|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReid, Garth|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|NHS Health Scotland|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010527en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-10-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2018-10-11|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee019662.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e019662.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version704.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.