Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Cantor on Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic: Cantor's 1885 Review of Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik
Author(s): Ebert, Philip
Rossberg, Marcus
Contact Email:
Keywords: Frege, Gottlob, 1848-1925 Criticism and interpretation
Logic, Symbolic and mathematical
Issue Date: Nov-2009
Date Deposited: 16-Mar-2011
Citation: Ebert P & Rossberg M (2009) Cantor on Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic: Cantor's 1885 Review of Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. History and Philosophy of Logic, 30 (4), pp. 341-348.
Abstract: In 1885, Georg Cantor published his review of Gottlob Frege's Grundlagen der Arithmetik. In this essay, we provide its first English translation together with an introductory note. We also provide a translation of a note by Ernst Zermelo on Cantor's review, and a new translation of Frege's brief response to Cantor. In recent years, it has become philosophical folklore that Cantor's 1885 review of Frege's Grundlagen already contained a warning to Frege. This warning is said to concern the defectiveness of Frege's notion of extension. The exact scope of such speculations varies and sometimes extends as far as crediting Cantor with an early hunch of the paradoxical nature of Frege's notion of extension. William Tait goes even further and deems Frege 'reckless' for having missed Cantor's explicit warning regarding the notion of extension. As such, Cantor's purported inkling would have predated the discovery of the Russell-Zermelo paradox by almost two decades. In our introductory essay, we discuss this alleged implicit (or even explicit) warning, separating two issues: first, whether the most natural reading of Cantor's criticism provides an indication that the notion of extension is defective; second, whether there are other ways of understanding Cantor that support such an interpretation and can serve as a precisification of Cantor's presumed warning.
DOI Link: 10.1080/01445340903102813
Rights: This is an electronic version of an article published in History and Philosophy of Logic, (2009), 30 (4), pp.341-348. History and Philosophy of Logic is available online at: (

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cantorreview_Final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version126.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.