Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27767
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvan Kempen, Janneke A Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorSchers, Henk Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhilp, Ianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOlde Rikkert, Marcel G Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorMelis, Rene J Fen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T09:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T09:04:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-03en_UK
dc.identifier.other287en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27767-
dc.description.abstractBackground EASY-Care Two step Older people Screening (EASY-Care TOS) is a stepped approach to identify frail older people at risk for negative health outcomes in primary care, and makes use of General Practitioners’ (GPs) readily-available information. We aimed to determine the predictive value of EASY-Care TOS for negative health outcomes within the year from assessment. Methods A total of 587 patients of four GP practices in and around Nijmegen (The Netherlands) consented to participate in a longitudinal primary care registry based cohort study. Participants’ frailty was judged by their GP following the EASY-Care TOS procedure and by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) at baseline. After one year health outcomes of the participants were measured by reassessment with the EASY-Care TOS procedure. Results Follow up information was available for 520 of 587 participants. In the non-frail group 9 % showed any negative health outcomes (death, ADL decline, institutionalisation, too ill to undergo assessment), against 30 % in the frail group (95 % confidence interval of the difference (CI): 14 %–28 %). Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of the EASY-Care TOS frailty judgement for a composite of negative health outcomes mentioned was 0.67 (95 % CI: 0.62-0.73). Compared with discrimination on the basis of age, sex and GP practice (AUC 0.70), adding EASY-Care TOS frailty judgement increased the AUC to 0.75 (+0.05, p = 0.02). The AUC on the basis of a full CGA is almost comparable to the AUC of the model with age, sex, and frailty judgement with EASY-Care TOS: 0.76 (+0.07, p = 0.005). Conclusions GPs applying the EASY-Care TOS procedure, where they only perform additional assessment when they judge this as necessary, can predict negative health outcomes in their older populations efficiently and almost as accurately as a complete specialist CGA.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMCen_UK
dc.relationvan Kempen JAL, Schers HJ, Philp I, Olde Rikkert MGM & Melis RJF (2015) Predictive validity of a two-step tool to map frailty in primary care. BMC Medicine, 13, Art. No.: 287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0519-9en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectFrailty assessmenten_UK
dc.subjectprimary health careen_UK
dc.subjectgeneral practiceen_UK
dc.subjectavailable informationen_UK
dc.subjectpredictive valueen_UK
dc.titlePredictive validity of a two-step tool to map frailty in primary careen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-015-0519-9en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid26631066en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1741-7015en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date03/12/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRadboud University Nijmegenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRadboud University Nijmegenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHeart of England NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRadboud University Nijmegenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRadboud University Nijmegenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000365785500001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84949214171en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid948179en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3972-6496en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-11-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-11-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-09-06en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorvan Kempen, Janneke A L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSchers, Henk J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhilp, Ian|0000-0002-3972-6496en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOlde Rikkert, Marcel G M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMelis, Rene J F|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-09-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-09-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamevan Kempen et al 2015.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1741-7015en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
van Kempen et al 2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version753.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.