Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27660
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Re-conceptualising Socio-economic Rights in Transitional Justice Societies
Author(s): Boyle, Katie
Keywords: Socio-economic rights
transitional justice
reparations
remedies
deliberative democracy
prioritisation
judicial incrementalism
constitutionalisation
comparative constitutionalism
Issue Date: 31-Dec-2016
Citation: Boyle K (2016) Re-conceptualising Socio-economic Rights in Transitional Justice Societies, Journal of Law, Social Justice and Global Development, 20 (2). https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/lgd_issue_2016_2/katie_boyle_2016_2.pdf.
Abstract: This article questions whether sufficient attention is given to addressing violations of socioeconomic rights in the transitional justice context. Economic and Social rights (ESR) are rights associated with areas such as health, education, employment and housing. They are binding international legal standards and their protection extends to some of the most vulnerable groups in society. Transitional justice is the discipline examining the mechanisms through which the wrongs of a prior regime can be addressed when a state moves from illiberal regime to liberal democracy. The discourse has focussed increasing attention on socio-economic dimensions of transitional justice without fully grasping the nature or status of socio-economic rights law. This article uses a legal perspective in order to ask whether theories of prioritisation, judicial incrementalism and deliberative democracy will assist in ensuring pre-transition structural inequalities are addressed as part of the transitional justice paradigm and in accordance with international law requirements. It is argued that the emerging approach of addressing socio-economic rights violations through means of reparation may fail to address the structural inequalities associated with the prior regime. This article proposes that new and alternative structures must be imagined if the transitional justice discipline is to adequately address socio-economic violations in an emerging democracy with a view to establishing long term peace.
URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/lgd_issue_2016_2/katie_boyle_2016_2.pdf
Rights: © 2017, Journal of Law, Social Justice & Global Development. The Journal’s articles are issued under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This allows a use and redistribution of each article provided that the journal and author or any other significant source (a cited funder or sponsor) are duly credited. The article must not be traded or used for commercial purposes, and that any material entity derived from this article must be made available under the same license terms.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
katie_boyle_2016_2.pdfFulltext - Published Version510.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.