Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27653
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSemple, Seanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Stephenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Rachelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Lynnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Tracyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Shirleyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLyttle, Susanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAmos, Amandaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T16:41:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-20T16:41:44Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27653-
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine if low-cost air-quality monitors providing personalised feedback of household second-hand smoke (SHS) concentrations plus standard health service advice on SHS were more effective than standard advice in helping parents protect their child from SHS. Design A randomised controlled trial of a personalised intervention delivered to disadvantaged mothers who were exposed to SHS at home. Changes in household concentrations of fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) were the primary outcome. Methods Air-quality monitors measured household PM2.5 concentrations over approximately 6 days at baseline and at one-month and six-months post-intervention. Data on smoking and smoking-rules were gathered. Participants were randomised to either Group A (standard health service advice on SHS) or Group B (standard advice plus personalised air-quality feedback). Group B participants received personalised air-quality feedback after the baseline measurement and at 1-month. Both groups received air-quality feedback at 6-months. Results 120 mothers were recruited of whom 117 were randomised. Follow up was completed after 1-month in 102 and at 6-months in 78 participants. There was no statistically significant reduction in PM2.5 concentrations by either intervention type at 1-month or 6-months, nor significant differences between the two groups at 1-month (p = 0.76) and 6-month follow-up (p = 0.16). Conclusions Neither standard advice nor standard advice plus personalised air-quality feedback were effective in reducing PM2.5 concentrations in deprived households where smoking occurred. Finding ways of identifying homes where air-quality feedback can be a useful tool to change household smoking behaviour is important to ensure resources are targeted successfully.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationSemple S, Turner S, O'Donnell R, Adams L, Henderson T, Mitchell S, Lyttle S & Amos A (2018) Using air-quality feedback to encourage disadvantaged parents to create a smoke-free home: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Environment International, 120, pp. 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.039en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Semple S, Turner S, O'Donnell R, Adams L, Henderson T, Mitchell S, Lyttle S & Amos A (2018) Using air-quality feedback to encourage disadvantaged parents to create a smoke-free home: Results from a randomised controlled trial, Environment International, 120, pp. 104-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.039 © 2018, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectEnvironmental Tobacco Smokeen_UK
dc.subjectSecond-hand Smokeen_UK
dc.subjectChildrenen_UK
dc.subjectPM2.5en_UK
dc.subjectEducationen_UK
dc.subjectInterventionen_UK
dc.titleUsing air-quality feedback to encourage disadvantaged parents to create a smoke-free home: Results from a randomised controlled trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-08-02en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[FS2SF Quantitative Paper 250718_changes accepted (002).pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.039en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30076982en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnvironment Internationalen_UK
dc.citation.issn0160-4120en_UK
dc.citation.volume120en_UK
dc.citation.spage104en_UK
dc.citation.epage110en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderChief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.author.emailsean.semple@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date01/08/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRCO Consultingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lanarkshireen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lanarkshireen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lanarkshireen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lanarkshireen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000448688500011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85050768970en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid979531en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0462-7295en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2713-1847en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-07-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-07-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-08-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSemple, Sean|0000-0002-0462-7295en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurner, Stephen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Donnell, Rachel|0000-0003-2713-1847en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAdams, Lynn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHenderson, Tracy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMitchell, Shirley|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLyttle, Susan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAmos, Amanda|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-08-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-08-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2019-08-02|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFS2SF Quantitative Paper 250718_changes accepted (002).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0160-4120en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FS2SF Quantitative Paper 250718_changes accepted (002).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version226.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.