Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27588
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCreaddie, Mayen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBenwell, Bethanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGritti, Aliceen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T00:02:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-02T00:02:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-16en_UK
dc.identifier.other551en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27588-
dc.description.abstractBackground Research on patients’ complaints about healthcare has tended to focus on the typology of complaints and complainants to homogenise complaints and better understand safety implications. Nonetheless, complaints speak to a broader spectrum of harm and suffering that go beyond formal adverse events. Complaints about care episodes can take considerable time and effort, generate negative energy and may leave a dogged ‘minority’ embittered. Methods This study provides an overview of the process and rhetoric of how patients formulate written complaints. We collated a data corpus comprising 60 letters of complaints and their responses over a period of one month. This paper focuses on the complaint letters only. National Health Service (NHS) Complaint Department staff in a healthcare area in the United Kingdom (UK) anonymized the letters. We took a broad qualitative approach to analysing the data drawing upon Discourse Analysis focusing on the rhetorical and persuasive strategies employed by the complainants. Results What patients complained about related to how they complained, with complainants expending considerable effort in persuasive rhetoric that sought to legitimise the complaint drawing upon different sources of epistemic authority. The complainants struggle to be an ‘objective’ witness as the complaint evolves from an implicit neglect narrative to increasing ‘noise’ with other features such as Direct Reported Speech used to animate and authenticate the narrative. Many of the complex complaints appeared to evidence some psychological distress. This was associated with the complainants’ reports of experiencing cumulative poor health care and their repeated failure to resolve the complaint. The subsequent delicate and potentially stigmatized formal act of complaining was a source of additional distress. Conclusions Complaints are involved narratives often predicated on the expectation they will not be given due credence. Health care staff may benefit from understanding how complaints are formulated to be able to more appropriately address the focus and extent of patients’ grievances from the outset and therefore, reduce the considerable associated harm.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMCen_UK
dc.relationMcCreaddie M, Benwell B & Gritti A (2018) Traumatic journeys; understanding the rhetoric of patients' complaints. BMC Health Services Research, 18, Art. No.: 551. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3339-8en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectHealthcare complaintsen_UK
dc.subjectRhetoricen_UK
dc.subjectDiscourse analysisen_UK
dc.subjectPsychological distressen_UK
dc.subjectGrievancesen_UK
dc.titleTraumatic journeys; understanding the rhetoric of patients' complaintsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-018-3339-8en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30012119en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Health Services Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1472-6963en_UK
dc.citation.volume18en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date16/07/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal College of Surgeons (Ireland)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLiterature and Languages - Divisionen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewbattle Abbey Collegeen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000438826000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85050103779en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid963590en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-06-27en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-06-27en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-08-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCreaddie, May|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBenwell, Bethan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGritti, Alice|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-08-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-08-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameTraumatic journeys understanding the rhetoric of patients complaints.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Literature and Languages Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Traumatic journeys understanding the rhetoric of patients complaints.pdfFulltext - Published Version897.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.