Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShapira, Marinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGayle, Vernonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Elspethen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-14T00:01:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-14T00:01:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03en_UK
dc.identifier.othere2180en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27483-
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the role of family migration in the life course of couples. We ask whether internal migration and residential mobility for contemporary dual-earner couples has negative consequences for the stability of their partnership and investigate whether any negative changes in partners’ employment characteristics following family migration are associated with higher risks of dissolution of their unions. We use the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), which provides nationally representative data on households and couples over the period of 18 years and has a wide range of potentially important prospective and retrospective information on households and individuals. We undertake a duration analysis of union dissolution by modelling the hazard of union dissolution. The findings show that union stability is affected by spatial moves – geographically-mobile couples are at higher risk of union dissolution. Long distance internal migration and frequent moves increase the risk, while short-distance residential moves are associated with greater union stability. Overall, we found that the negative effect of family migration on union stability is relatively small and decreases over-the-time. Similarly, positive effects that some types of family migration might have on union stability also tend to decrease over-the-time. We found that the risk of union dissolution is better explained by partners’ socio-demographic characteristics (age, level of education), and by the characteristics of their union such as its type and duration. Union stability is also associated with the employment and occupational characteristics of both partners, as well as with changes in these characteristics. Negative changes in occupational position or employment status of either partner, but especially of the male partner, increase the risk of union dissolution. However, the effect of changes in the employment characteristics of each partner on union stability is relatively small and tend to disappear over time. We found some evidence that the impact of the negative changes in employment characteristics of geographically mobile couples post-migration on the stability of their union is mediated by the gender of the partner who experienced these changes. Negative changes in the employment status of the male partner post-migration slightly increase the risk of union dissolution, while negative changes in female partner’s employment post-migration slightly decrease that risk. We found that the risk to the union’s stability is highest immediately after the adverse changes in the male partner’s employment status happen, but that the risk reduces with the passage of time.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationShapira M, Gayle V & Graham E (2019) Moving on and moving out: the implications of socio-spatial mobility for union stability. Population, Space and Place, 25 (2), Art. No.: e2180. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA‐SN‐5151‐1; https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2180en_UK
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors. Population, Space and Place Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectGeography, Planning and Developmenten_UK
dc.subjectDemographyen_UK
dc.titleMoving on and moving out: the implications of socio-spatial mobility for union stabilityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/psp.2180en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePopulation, Space and Placeen_UK
dc.citation.issn1544-8452en_UK
dc.citation.issn1544-8444en_UK
dc.citation.volume25en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Councilen_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA‐SN‐5151‐1en_UK
dc.citation.date07/08/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000461078200016en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid10.1371/journal.pone.0201215en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid943916en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8860-1841en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-05-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-07-11en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shapira_et_al-2019-Population__Space_and_Place.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.