Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27389
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Using secondary analysis of qualitative data of patient experiences of health care to inform health services research and policy
Author(s): Ziebland, Sue B
Hunt, Kate
Contact Email: kate.hunt@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Health policy
qualitative interviews
secondary analysis
Issue Date: 1-Jul-2014
Citation: Ziebland SB & Hunt K (2014) Using secondary analysis of qualitative data of patient experiences of health care to inform health services research and policy, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 19 (3), pp. 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614524187.
Abstract: Qualitative research is recognized as an important method for including patients’ voices and experiences in health services research and policy-making, yet the considerable potential to analyse existing qualitative data to inform health policy and practice has been little realized. This failure may partly be explained by: a lack of awareness amongst health policy makers of the increasing wealth of qualitative data available; and around 15 years of internal debates among qualitative researchers on the strengths, limitations and validity of re-use of qualitative data. Whilst acknowledging the challenges of qualitative secondary data analysis, we argue that there is a growing imperative to be pragmatic and to undertake analysis of existing qualitative data collections where they have the potential to contribute to health policy formulation. Time pressures are inherent in the policy-making process and in many circumstances it is not possible to seek funding, conduct and analyse new qualitative studies of patients’ experiences in time to inform a specific policy. The danger then is that the patient voice, and the experiences of relatives and carers, is either excluded or included in a way that is easily dismissed as ‘unrepresentative’. We argue that secondary analysis of qualitative data collections may sometimes be an effective means to enable patient experiences to inform policy decision-making.
DOI Link: 10.1177/1355819614524187
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ziebland Hunt 2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version87.17 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-26    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.