Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27316
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGallopel-Morvan, Karineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorGuignard, Romainen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEker, Figenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBeguinot, Emmanuelleen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-31T17:13:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-31T17:13:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27316-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The cigarette, like the cigarette pack, is used by tobacco companies as a promotional tool. We explore how the cigarette could potentially be used as a dissuasive tool. Methods An online survey was conducted with 15-30 year old smokers and non-smokers (N=998) in France to explore their perceptions of a plain cigarette (grey with no brand name) and three branded cigarettes (regular, slim, pink). Participants were randomly assigned to view the plain cigarette and either the regular, slim or pink cigarette. They were asked to rate the cigarettes by Appeal (tastiest, highest quality, most expensive), Harm (most dangerous, most effective for motivating people to talk about tobacco dangers), and Perceived behavioral impact (most effective to convince teenagers not to start, to motivate smokers to reduce consumption and quit). Results In comparison to the grey cigarette, each of the branded cigarettes were considered more appealing, less harmful, and more likely to motivate teenagers to start and less likely to motivate smokers to reduce consumption or quit. Conclusions The study suggests that altering the appearance of the cigarette may reduce cigarette appeal, increase harm perceptions, and deter both young people and smokers. Implications Very little research has focused on dissuasive cigarettes whereas the cigarette stick has become very important for tobacco companies for communication purposes. This is the first study to compare the effect of various branded cigarettes (regular, slim, pink) with a plain grey cigarette on young adult smokers and non-smokers. The findings suggest that a plain grey cigarette can reduce cigarette appeal, increase perceptions of harm, and may deter use among both smokers and non-smokers.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_UK
dc.relationGallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Guignard R, Eker F & Beguinot E (2019) Consumer Perceptions of Cigarette Design in France: A Comparison of Regular, Slim, Pink and Plain Cigarettes. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 21 (7), pp. 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty105en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Nicotine & Tobacco Research following peer review. The version of record Karine Gallopel-Morvan, Crawford Moodie, Romain Guignard, Figen Eker, Emmanuelle Béguinot, Consumer Perceptions of Cigarette Design in France: A Comparison of Regular, Slim, Pink and Plain Cigarettes, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 21, Issue 7, July 2019, Pages 911–917 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty105en_UK
dc.subjectperceptionen_UK
dc.subjecttobaccoen_UK
dc.subjectcigarettesen_UK
dc.subjectnon-smokersen_UK
dc.subjectsmokersen_UK
dc.titleConsumer Perceptions of Cigarette Design in France: A Comparison of Regular, Slim, Pink and Plain Cigarettesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-05-25en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[nty105.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ntr/nty105en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29800331en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNicotine and Tobacco Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-994Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn1462-2203en_UK
dc.citation.volume21en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spage911en_UK
dc.citation.epage917en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.author.emailc.s.moodie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date24/05/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Public Health (EHESP)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFrench Institute for Public Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFrench National Committee Against Tobacco (CNCT)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFrench National Committee Against Tobacco (CNCT)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000493384200009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85068543804en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid913058en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-05-23en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-05-31en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
nty105.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version632.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.