Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27301
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dann, Charlotte | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Callaghan, Jane E M | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-29T13:55:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-29T13:55:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-06-30 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27301 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The rise in the popularity of tattoos over the past decade is evident, with recent figures suggesting that 1 in 5 people in the UK have a tattoo (YouGov, 2015). Tattoos are often perceived as a ‘masculine practice’, heavily raced and classed (Sargent & Corse, 2013), and represented negatively on women’s bodies. Tattooed women have been constructed as unattractive, promiscuous and loud (Swami & Furnham, 2007) as well as being linked to displaying aggressive behaviour (Swami et al., 2015). Stereotypes that centre on tattooed bodies are not the only ideologies formed for how women should or should not ‘be’ – there is also the example of mothering. In UK newspapers, there are discourses produced that centre on ideal motherhood – the way to act, to behave, to dress amongst other things (Hadfield, Rudoe, & Sanderson‐Mann, 2007). Young mothers are often vilified for their ‘poor choice’ to become a mother so young. They are subject to constant surveillance and scrutiny for how they live, including decisions about the ‘right’ way to spend their money. For these women, choosing to spend money on a tattoo becomes the subject of debate because, as tattoos do not serve the benefit of the child, they would be considered another one of those bad choices (McDermott & Graham, 2005). In this paper, we explore the class based focus on tattooed mother’s bodies, and unpack the constructions of these bodies as discussed by tattooed mothers. We argue that the discursive policing of the tattooed mother is achieved, at least in part, through a construction of a sense of a ‘right’ and a ‘wrong’ way to be a tattooed mother. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | British Psychological Society | en_UK |
dc.relation | Dann C & Callaghan JEM (2017) Embodiment and Excess: Constructions of tattooed mothers in the UK. Psychology of Women Section Review, 19 (1). https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/psychology-of-women-section-review/psychology-of-women-section-review-vol-19-1-spring-2017.html | en_UK |
dc.rights | Reproduced with permission from Psychology of Women Section Review © The British Psychological Society 2017 | en_UK |
dc.title | Embodiment and Excess: Constructions of tattooed mothers in the UK | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Psychology of Women Section Review | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2396-8796 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1466-3724 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 19 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.identifier.url | https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/psychology-of-women-section-review/psychology-of-women-section-review-vol-19-1-spring-2017.html | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 01/06/2017 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Northampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Northampton | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 909892 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5241-3398 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-01-18 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2017-01-18 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2018-05-28 | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Embodiment | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Emotional well-being of women | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Feminism | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Feminism and Women's Representation | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Gender | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Place, Belonging and Identity | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Self-identity | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Dann, Charlotte| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Callaghan, Jane E M|0000-0002-5241-3398 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2018-05-29 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2018-05-29| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Dann20179214.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1466-3724 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dann20179214.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 154.16 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.