Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27292
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForbat, Lizen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Rowenaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBilton-Simek, Rachelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, Karemahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Marshaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHaraldsdottir, Ernaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T12:06:52Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-29T12:06:52Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-28en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27292-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Face-to-face/group education for palliative caregivers is successful, but relies on caregivers travelling, being absent from the patient, and rigid timings. This presents inequities for those in rural locations. Aim: To design and test an innovative distance-learning educational package (PrECEPt: PalliativE Caregivers Education Package). Design: Single-arm mixed-method feasibility proof-of-concept trial (ACTRN12616000601437). The primary outcome was carer self-efficacy, with secondary outcomes focused on caregiver preparedness and carer tasks/needs. Analysis focused on three outcome measures (taken at baseline and 6 weeks) and feasibility/acceptability qualitative data. Setting and participants: A single specialist palliative care service. Eligible informal caregivers were those of patients registered with the outpatient or community service, where the patient had a prognosis of ⩾12 weeks, supporting someone with nutrition/hydration and/or pain management needs, proficient in English and no major mental health diagnosis. Results: Two modules were developed and tested (nutrition/hydration and pain management) with 18 caregivers. The materials did not have a statistically significant impact on carer self-efficacy. However, statistically significant improvements were observed on the two subsidiary measures of (1) caregiving tasks, consequences and needs (p = 0.03, confidence interval: 0.72, 9.4) and (2) caregiver preparedness (p = 0.001, confidence interval: −1.22, −0.46). The study determined that distance learning is acceptable and feasible for both caregivers and healthcare professionals. Conclusion: Distance education improves caregiver preparedness and is a feasible and acceptable approach. A two-arm trial would determine whether the materials benefitted caregivers and patients compared to a control group not receiving the materials. Additional modules could be fruitfully developed and offered.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationForbat L, Robinson R, Bilton-Simek R, Francois K, Lewis M & Haraldsdottir E (2018) Distance education methods are useful for delivering education to palliative caregivers: A single-arm trial of an education package (PalliativE Caregivers Education Package). Palliative Medicine, 32 (2), pp. 581-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317712849en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectPalliative careen_UK
dc.subjectcaregiversen_UK
dc.subjectdistance educationen_UK
dc.subjectpain managementen_UK
dc.subjectnutritional sciencesen_UK
dc.titleDistance education methods are useful for delivering education to palliative caregivers: A single-arm trial of an education package (PalliativE Caregivers Education Package)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[PalMed_PrECEPt findings.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269216317712849en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28604233en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePalliative Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1477-030Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0269-2163en_UK
dc.citation.volume32en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage581en_UK
dc.citation.epage588en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderACT Healthen_UK
dc.author.emailelizabeth.forbat1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date12/06/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAustralian Catholic Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAustralian Catholic Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCalvary Health Care ACTen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAustralian Catholic Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Buffaloen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Margaret Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000423322000030en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85041125866en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid909768en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7218-5775en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-04-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-04-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-05-28en_UK
dc.subject.tagCarersen_UK
dc.subject.tagCancer and Palliative Careen_UK
dc.subject.tagQualitative Research Methodsen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorForbat, Liz|0000-0002-7218-5775en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRobinson, Rowena|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBilton-Simek, Rachel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrancois, Karemah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLewis, Marsha|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaraldsdottir, Erna|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|ACT Health|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2267-05-13en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePalMed_PrECEPt findings.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1477-030Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PalMed_PrECEPt findings.pdfFulltext - Published Version667 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.